Viewing these images remind me a lot of caricature portraiture.<p>As with real artwork, the eye is drawn to embelishments, exagerations, and simplification and directed by composition.<p>In pieces by a competant artist, these add a new level of interest and dimension to the piece.<p>With these images, following what makes each image is always a dead end. There is no composition and the embelishments are mechanical, random and uninteresting.<p>For example, I find myself wondering why the the artist chose to paint the mouth so asymetrical. Is the artist trying to express an emotion? Who is the subject, and why have the been rendered as they have. It's confusing and a challenge to critique the artwork... until I realize its just bit of randomness generated by algorithm incapable of any creativity beyond how the programmer applied generic and randomizing programming methods.<p>There isn't and cannot be anything unique to any of the images. Once you've studied any one of them, you've really experienced most of what the programmer/artist has contributed.