Pretty inline symbolic mathematics in Org-mode

You can also tap into the entire Jupyter system using emacs-jupyter [1] which also includes an org-babel component – and it looks like you can preview the LaTeX in Org mode given a few options options [2].<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;nnicandro&#x2F;emacs-jupyter" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;nnicandro&#x2F;emacs-jupyter</a><p>[2] See <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;nnicandro&#x2F;emacs-jupyter#a-note-on-using-the-results-header-argument" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;nnicandro&#x2F;emacs-jupyter#a-note-on-using-t...</a> and <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;nnicandro&#x2F;emacs-jupyter&#x2F;issues&#x2F;218" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;nnicandro&#x2F;emacs-jupyter&#x2F;issues&#x2F;218</a>

This really makes me want to give SymPy a proper try. And I didn&#x27;t know about `org-fragtog`, that&#x27;s really neat!<p>I&#x27;m a bit confused about the main idea here: doesn&#x27;t the usage of `:results raw` mean the output will be inserted multiple times, if the code is re-run? As far as I know `replace` doesn&#x27;t actually work with `raw`. Would love to be wrong though.

How I wish papers in science and engineering were written in such format (or were created with org-mode source files with code which one could download and play with), where we could preview steps of derivations in some symbolic manipulation program, instead of &quot;after simple transformation we get...&quot;