TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

BoA Purchase Agreement from Berkshire Hathaway

38 点作者 feydr超过 13 年前

7 条评论

AndyIngram超过 13 年前
Wow, I was only slightly aware of the problems at BoA, but this deal must mean that they were having a big problem raising money. You would think they could of had a fire-sale of some assets like their china holdings to better protect shareholders. That being said having Buffet show confidence in your firm is valuable and it paid off well in the past for GE, Goldman and before that Salomon Brothers.
评论 #2926892 未加载
评论 #2927572 未加载
dmm超过 13 年前
I thought BoA said they didn't need capital...
评论 #2926851 未加载
xradionut超过 13 年前
Maybe Warren thought BOA was a good investment now that Wikileak's BOA "hard drive of secrets" has been "disappeared".
评论 #2927815 未加载
pchristensen超过 13 年前
A $5B investment, not an outright purchase.
评论 #2926705 未加载
chulipuli超过 13 年前
Given the amount of capital that B&#38;H needs to invest yearly, this is a natural choice.<p>Buffet likes banks, he said so in the book The Snowball (a must read). Banks have float, which is interest free money "floating around" waiting to be invested by the bank, but not owned by the bank.<p>BOA also sells insurance, which has more float than a bank. B&#38;H has a pretty effective group of insurance business people. A lot of the B&#38;H wealth comes from the insurance industry.
typicalrunt超过 13 年前
That's one hell of a bet. I'm actually surprised that Buffet didn't want to buy the bank's debt offerings (if there are any).<p>I haven't read past the first couple paragraphs (too much legalese) but is there an out clause? If BoA tanks in the stock market, Berkshire could stand to lose a lot of money on the common stock.
评论 #2926797 未加载
评论 #2926897 未加载
mcantelon超过 13 年前
First Goldman Sachs, now BoA. Stay classy, Warren.