TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Data Fabric vs. Data Mesh: What's the Difference?

66 点作者 electrum超过 3 年前

7 条评论

DrBenCarson超过 3 年前
These are two buzzwords that I still, for whatever reason, feel no momentum for.
评论 #29269881 未加载
claytonjy超过 3 年前
So Data Fabric is a bolt-on solution that we can&#x27;t even honestly attempt today, while Data Mesh requires everyone in the engineering org to embrace data products?<p>Sounds like startups might adopt Data Mesh, while it&#x27;s easy to reorient org-level behavior, but big enterprises are doomed to carry forward their current messes until AI magically delivers us Data Fabric as a viable option.<p>Anyone having more success with these approaches than my pessimistic take implies? Is it easier to adopt Data Mesh in a large org than I realize? Is Data Fabric a more viable option than the author considers?
评论 #29273819 未加载
评论 #29273877 未加载
ekzhu超过 3 年前
There is no reason for both approaches to not coexist: a centralized catalog managed by a small team, setting the “gold standard” for the many decentralized data producers and curators, who are incentivized to maximize their impacts (i.e., usage) by having higher quality data following the standard.<p>Another thing to point out: besides relying on the future promises of ML, there are already many signals that can be used by a centralized catalog for data discovery. For example: data sketches (MinHash, Hyperloglog) for joinable datasets, social signals (likes, comments, stars, etc. see Alation and Select Star SQL), lineages through data movements (e.g., Azure Data Factory and Azure Purview). If the centralized catalog uses those signals, then the data producers are incentivized to provide them for better visibility.
评论 #29269554 未加载
评论 #29271668 未加载
评论 #29270188 未加载
oconnore超过 3 年前
This reminds me of David Mindell&#x27;s work on situated autonomy: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=M0-tafxh7gc" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=M0-tafxh7gc</a> <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.robotics.org&#x2F;userAssets&#x2F;riaUploads&#x2F;file&#x2F;20-OurRobotsOurselvesTowardSituatedAutonomy-DavidMindell.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.robotics.org&#x2F;userAssets&#x2F;riaUploads&#x2F;file&#x2F;20-OurRo...</a><p>&gt; The highest levels of technology are not necessarily full autonomy, but situated autonomy<p>&gt; All autonomous systems are joint human-machine cognitive systems<p>Fundamental questions: Where are the people? Which people are they? What are they doing? When are they doing it?
justicezyx超过 3 年前
A surprisingly well-organized and meaningful description of 2 marketing concepts, seems targeted towards CXO&#x27;s in making IT solution buying decisions.
AtlasBarfed超过 3 年前
They both get muddy when dropped in the Data Lake.
评论 #29273876 未加载
DemocracyFTW超过 3 年前
&gt; At its core, the Data Fabric is about eliminating humans from the process as much as possible.