TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Crises of Elite Competition in the East and West

106 点作者 arexxbifs超过 3 年前

14 条评论

1cvmask超过 3 年前
Isn&#x27;t the vast majority of the true problems caused by not enough supply of all KINDS of NEW housing being built to accompany both massive population growth (including immigrants in some areas), massive wealth increase among the global rich (who can now own multiple empty properties in marquee cities), landlords eating up more of your income AND in the US case government rules and regulations creating a predatory medical system that consumes over 18 percent of GDP.<p>In the 70s a blue collar worker could buy a house and look after their family. Now we have massive asset price inflation due to low interest rates and not enough growth in housing assets. This can lead to future social unrest on a massive scale (not just occasional riots&#x2F;protests).
评论 #29387594 未加载
评论 #29388043 未加载
评论 #29387621 未加载
评论 #29387847 未加载
nazgulnarsil超过 3 年前
The four major black holes of modernity are not the result of incorrectly tuned policy levers but the result of fundamental cultural blindspots. These four areas: education, medicine, housing, and prison, all relate to one central problem. An incoherent philosophy when it comes to the concept of &#x27;responsibility.&#x27; When I say black holes I mean that they are capable of sucking up arbitrary amounts of capital as we fight over them fruitlessly. And to be absolutely clear: the claim here is not that personal responsiibity should be &#x27;higher&#x27; or &#x27;lower&#x27; (whatever those mean) than they are now, that&#x27;s what I mean by fighting over them. I genuinely mean that the incoherence of the concept itself is the problem. Consider the following questions: how responsible is a criminal for their actions? how responsible are young people for making good decisions about their education? to what degree are NIMBYs responsible for the housing crisis? how can externalities of housing be assigned responsibility to various parties? does the medicalization of problems, and thus the denial of agency lead to more problems than it solves?<p>You&#x27;ve seen debates about these and they never go anywhere because there aren&#x27;t final answers. There is no algorithm for &#x27;blame&#x27; that is perfectly equitable. Neither holding people to high standards nor relaxing those standards is stable or workable. Reality is always multicausal and situations are different. The traditional answer to this is the discretion of judges to adjust to what is happening. But law still has to deal with the fundamental incoherence and it has been deprived of one of the historical ways it has dealt with it. The idea that different people might have differing capabilities to take responsibility for things, whatever the reason, is in untenable tension with the notion that all men are created equal. We have a few categories that recognize that not everyone can hold the same privileges such as child, felon, or legally mentally unable to grant consent. There are also the only semi legible ways that money and access grant privileges while that very same hidden nature frees the beneficiaries of any responsibility for the poor exercise of said privilege. Now we&#x27;re seeing other countries find their own ways forward in creating a tiered society like China&#x27;s social credit system or the soft classism of inscrutable and gameable admission to elite colleges (whereas before lower class people got in on merit). These are terrible solutions and we had better find better ones before the march of history declares a shitty winner for us. We can find a way to more tightly couple privileges and responsibilities or we can continue reaping the externalities of allowing incentives to drive a stronger wedge between them.
评论 #29388063 未加载
AnimalMuppet超过 3 年前
Hmm. So both western and eastern education systems are turning away from their cultural roots, trying to find some magic in the other&#x27;s approach.<p>&gt; The situations of Asian countries and the United States differ sub­stantially in the details, but both face the same core problem: how to offer as many people as possible a decent job with a family wage.<p>This is the heart of the (rather length) article. Elite competition is so intense because the consequences of not making it into the elite are so stark. (Related: Even getting the elite degree doesn&#x27;t mean that you get a decent job. The elite competition doesn&#x27;t end when you get into college, or even when you get out.)
评论 #29387541 未加载
评论 #29387531 未加载
评论 #29387684 未加载
BariumBlue超过 3 年前
I&#x27;m finding it interesting that all of the comments so far seem to have drawn very different conclusions about what the article was about. I think this article has many unique viewpoints that people aren&#x27;t used to and think of the point that stuck out to them the most as &quot;the point&quot; of the article
评论 #29389375 未加载
评论 #29396841 未加载
评论 #29391009 未加载
评论 #29389187 未加载
mherdeg超过 3 年前
I&#x27;ve been reading a Neil Gaiman book to the youngest kid every now and then which goes like:<p>&gt; Ladies of Light &amp; Ladies of Darkness,<p>&gt; &amp; Ladies of Never-You-Mind,<p>&gt; this is a prayer for a Blueberry Girl.<p>&gt; First, May you ladies be kind.<p>&gt; …<p>&gt; Dull days at forty, false friends at fifteen;<p>&gt; Let her have brave days and truth.<p>&gt; Let her go places that we’ve never been;<p>&gt; Trust and delight in her youth.<p>And then I read stuff like this, or articles about the grim reality of private schools (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theatlantic.com&#x2F;magazine&#x2F;archive&#x2F;2021&#x2F;04&#x2F;private-schools-are-indefensible&#x2F;618078&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theatlantic.com&#x2F;magazine&#x2F;archive&#x2F;2021&#x2F;04&#x2F;private...</a>), and I wonder … how did we get here? is this what it means to want your kids to go places we&#x27;ve never been? Is this ... good?<p>From Flanagan&#x27;s Atlantic article:<p>&gt; Why do these parents need so much reassurance? They “are finding that it’s harder and harder to get their children through the eye of the needle”—admitted into the best programs, all the way from kindergarten to college. But it’s more than that. The parents have a sense that their kids will be emerging into a bleaker landscape than they did. The brutal, winner-take-all economy won’t come for them—they’ve been grandfathered in. But they fear that it’s coming for their children, and that even a good education might not secure them a professional-class career.<p>&gt; …<p>&gt; Daniel Markovits, a professor at Yale Law School, coined the term meritocracy trap—a system that rewards an ever-growing share of society’s riches to an ever-shrinking pool of winners. “Today’s meritocrats still claim to get ahead through talent and effort, using means open to anyone,” he has written in these pages. “In practice, however, meritocracy now excludes everyone outside of a narrow elite.” This is a system that screws the poor, hollows out the middle class, and turns rich kids into exhausted, anxious, and maximally stressed-out adolescents who believe their future depends on getting into one of a very small group of colleges that routinely reject upwards of 90 percent of their applicants.<p>Is that all there is? Is it just, work work work, get the kids into a good school, line up their tutors and extracurricular enrichment, watch them graduate, maybe meet the grandkids, die?<p>Why do so many people want this so much?
评论 #29388640 未加载
评论 #29389045 未加载
joe_the_user超过 3 年前
Student loan forgiveness may be a handout to a certain sector but it&#x27;s a way to shape the economy. The problem the US has is vastly expanded educational sector that&#x27;s also, uh, crap. A more rigorous but less inflated system would be appropriate. But how you get that is hard to see.<p>The thing is, you have huge sectors; education, public transit, health care etc, that would be reasonable to improve but where privatization based capital investment have resulted in huge, costly and, well, shitty systems.<p>The only way out is removing a huge group of corrupt operators at the heart of each of these sectors. I don&#x27;t know what hope there is of this tbh.
评论 #29388341 未加载
smilekzs超过 3 年前
My rephrase of a key take-away point: As long as the underlying incentives remain misaligned, individual policy changes aimed to disrupt the competition landscape across the board would inevitably play the whack-a-mole game.
pfkurtz超过 3 年前
How can an article about &quot;elite competition&quot; not mention anything about how, during a few decades in the 20th Century, labor&#x27;s share of profits increased, and since 1980 has flatlined, with all rewards accruing to capital?<p>What analysis of elites doesn&#x27;t include reference to Rupert Murdoch and Charles Koch?<p>The author seems to get that the ruthless competition in our world is destroying lives, but he seems to blame the competitors and those who seek to improve things.
评论 #29391083 未加载
评论 #29391206 未加载
评论 #29399827 未加载
评论 #29388654 未加载
评论 #29388186 未加载
评论 #29388579 未加载
评论 #29388172 未加载
ilaksh超过 3 年前
The concluding sentence is the key takeaway for me.<p>&gt; Unless the productive forces driving spiraling competition for diminishing social and economic resources are resolved, social atomization, cultural con­flict, and their many effects will continue, in one guise or another.<p>My take is that most of the apparent social problems are related to problems like economic inequality and insufficiency. And the best hope we have to improve them is actually logistical&#x2F;technical. Better application of technology, such as for enhanced collaborative monitoring and reporting of resource usage and more sophisticated distribution systems (including high-tech forms of money) should make a big difference.
frazbin超过 3 年前
An essay on the theme &quot;compare and contrast SK&#x2F;JP&#x2F;CN educational cutthroatism with 21st century woke culture.&quot; Good enough if that&#x27;s the question assigned but.. why? Aoparently to push the zero sum narrative of elite overproduction, and pretending we all wanna go to Harvard when state schools are still perfectly adequate, then additionally pretending that you have to be a multi-intersectional individual to get into Harvard... seems like this guy just wants to have his culture war.
chillacy超过 3 年前
This is a very well reasoned article. The central thesis is that if culture follows economic realities (a notion I first encountered in Sapiens but have come to strongly believe), then readers (seems the audience consists of US cultural conservatives) should focus their efforts on changing the underlying economics, not waging the culture war.<p>&gt; No amount of snappy YouTube videos decrying the “degeneracy” of current elite trends, no amount of influencers selling the “trad lifestyle” to Instagram followers, no amount of pithy arguments aimed at defeating some imagined foe with “facts and logic” will affect these issues in any meaningful way<p>&gt; In the struggle between tradition and economic reality, tradition simply ends up being destroyed, excepting the few parts that can be adapted to serve completely new ends.<p>I would posit that a 3rd option exists that the author dismissed, but it would be to move to a new system (which is self-sustaining, unlike birth + immigration that the author dismisses) to match the new realities. I get that conservative thought is that it&#x27;s safest to cling to that which we know, but with all the changes so far (and to come with automation), it might be as fruitless as running a knowledge economy like a feudal monarchy.
评论 #29398968 未加载
bendbro超过 3 年前
&gt; The retreat by much of the Right into localism or an exclusive focus on personal virtue is a tacit admission that individuals simply have to look out for themselves, an equally empty response<p>No you can&#x27;t just take your ball and leave!
dustintrex超过 3 年前
Fascinating. TL;DR: What we think of as the Asian&#x2F;Confucian&#x2F;Tiger Mom school model of cramming every minute of your day actually originates from Prussia, while Western universities are rapidly going in the opposite direction and de-emphasizing book learning in favor of public demonstrations of virtue -- only it&#x27;s not Confucian virtue, but wokeness. Is Europe the only stronghold of sanity left?
评论 #29387745 未加载
syndacks超过 3 年前
Holy smokes, pull up a bag of popcorn, pour a glass of Pinot, and heat up that Volcano! This heavy hitter brings the cultural pith of a Franzen novel and the citation-laden academic register of an SEO educated academic behind a pseudonym. Wokeness, SATs, Xi, culture wars, and Marx -- oh my!
评论 #29388122 未加载