TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

How to Chrome Your Industry

18 点作者 colortone超过 16 年前

8 条评论

mixmax超过 16 年前
I think this is pretty disappointing coming from Harvard Business publishing.<p>Google isn't trying to create new grand markets that they might or might not get a share of, they are simply commoditizing their complementary products, and making them as good as possible.<p>Complementary products are products that are used together, and where one enhances the other - cars and gasoline are classic examples. By commoditizing, or making cheaper, your complementary product your own product becomes more desirable: If gas is cheaper cars are more desirable. This is classical economics, and has been known since Adam Smith.<p>Basically what this means for Google is that they have a strong interest in commoditizing the webbrowser, making it as good as possible, thus making their own complementary products more desirable. This is also one of the reasons they are interested in firefox - it isn't philanthropy: it's purely business.
评论 #295406 未加载
评论 #295328 未加载
IsaacSchlueter超过 16 年前
This guy basically gives Google credit for both the internet and open source software.<p>Why not "How to Apache Your Industry" or "How to Linux Your Industry"?<p>Furthermore, he suggests that it would be somehow similar if Walmart were to build parks... That's a huge jump.
benl超过 16 年前
This is an incredibly poorly thought out piece. Right from the beginning:<p>"Imagine what would happen if GM and Ford collaborated to invest in the components and architecture of a better public transport network -- and then licensed it for free to cities, states, and countries."<p>What? This is a completely bogus analogy with Google's browser strategy. A better public transport network in no way benefits GM/Ford to anywhere near the same extent that a better browser benefits Google. In fact it would quite possibly be detrimental to their business.
_b8r0超过 16 年前
TFA makes the staggering assumption that Chrome is in any way, shape or form a success.<p>That's quite a jump to make.
abstractbill超过 16 年前
All the companies and markets the article talks about are quite old. It seems like some kind of natural law that only relatively younger, hungrier companies will attempt to "Chrome" an industry. Any good counterexamples?
评论 #295447 未加载
andreyf超过 16 年前
Also known as "the suits catch on to what RMS has been saying since the 70's".
zain超过 16 年前
Chrome is a verb now?
评论 #295351 未加载
louislouis超过 16 年前
A little late jumping on the bandwagon hype.