TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Kolmogorov Complicity and the Parable of Lightning (2017)

114 点作者 phab超过 3 年前

7 条评论

chrispeel超过 3 年前
In case you missed it, there is such a thing as &quot;Kolmogorov complexity&quot;; I guess the author is making an alliterative pun by titling the post &quot;Kolmogorov complicity&quot;<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Kolmogorov_complexity" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Kolmogorov_complexity</a>
exolymph超过 3 年前
This was published in response to a lament about James Damore, in case anyone is wondering about the immediate context. The proximate issue was that women and men, on average &#x2F; in aggregate, are different. But the general principles apply to other issues as well.
评论 #29609262 未加载
评论 #29612414 未加载
评论 #29609425 未加载
评论 #29610330 未加载
marcosdumay超过 3 年前
Well, if you want to do it right, you don&#x27;t just &quot;not discuss&quot; the orthodoxy, you go out of your way to make discussing the orthodoxy very clearly forbidden on the research circle. You put &quot;we won&#x27;t allow anybody to talk about lightning&quot; on the first paragraph of your institution&#x27;s code of conduct. You actively censor people discussing it, and do all you can to erase it from their history.<p>On a related matter, people actively insisting that you discuss the lightning issue may be consciously trying to do the exact opposite, and get you in trouble. And, of course, if discussing the orthodoxy gets people in trouble, that&#x27;s a different issue from the orthodoxy itself and you may be more or free to talk about it, or maybe less, it has to be independently evaluated.
评论 #29611310 未加载
评论 #29609921 未加载
Wolfenstein98k超过 3 年前
He really is an excellent writer, isn&#x27;t he?
评论 #29610656 未加载
xondono超过 3 年前
I miss SSC so much
评论 #29609653 未加载
xbar超过 3 年前
Contrary to many places, the comments on SSC provide the better reading.
throwaway81523超过 3 年前
2017. Raised eyebrows for a moment because slatestarcodex moved to another url a year or so ago.