This just shifts the problem.<p>> The AGPL requires users to open source any software which uses your library; businesses will pay to avoid it. This is exactly what we want.<p>Or what if, you know, they go use some other open-source project, a competitor of yours, that isn't AGPL-licensed?<p>It's a prisoner's dilemma where everyone has to agree to use AGPL, or companies won't pay to use any AGPL software. And that isn't going to happen, because many open-source developers do it for other tangible benefits (resume padding, power & authority in the community, a social group, a hobby, etc)