TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Trisquel GNU/Linux

72 点作者 disadvantage超过 3 年前

6 条评论

elagost超过 3 年前
Trisquel is based on Ubuntu like other operating systems (Linux Mint, Pop!_OS, Zorin OS, etc.) but they do something unique - they rebuild the Ubuntu packages from source, instead of just including the Ubuntu repos in their software sources.<p>Trisquel is quite a usable distro for laptops that are 3-4 years old if you have an appropriate wireless card - Atheros 9xxx series cards tend to work well as the ath9k driver is FOSS. That&#x27;s really the only blocker most people encounter. Why run this over Debian Stable (without adding &quot;non-free&quot; sources) I couldn&#x27;t tell you. Debian tends to be more up to date than Trisquel since it&#x27;s usually based on the previous Ubuntu LTS.
评论 #29677226 未加载
评论 #29678517 未加载
srvmshr超过 3 年前
Since it runs on Linux-libre, there is a good chance several devices&#x2F;peripherals will fail to perform as intended. If the idea is to have a toy distro (working as a VM) to explore around, it’s looking great. But I don’t see why it will gain traction for real use case.
评论 #29674846 未加载
评论 #29675988 未加载
评论 #29674789 未加载
评论 #29674803 未加载
sdfjkl超过 3 年前
Why Trisquel?<p>&gt; entirely free software<p>&gt; teach users to value and protect their freedom<p>&gt; no binary-only firmware for wireless cards or proprietary drivers for AMD&#x2F;ATI and NVIDIA graphics cards are included
评论 #29674754 未加载
评论 #29675187 未加载
einpoklum超过 3 年前
Trisquel&#x27;s FAQ says:<p>&gt; <i>Why should I use Trisquel instead of one of the better-known distributions?</i><p>&gt; There are literally hundreds of GNU&#x2F;Linux distributions designed to fill every conceivable niche. Only a handful of them are entirely free software; Trisquel is one such distribution.<p>... but I disagree. Trisquel is based on ubuntu, and uses systemd. Not just as some optional init system you can remove - it&#x27;s deeply dependent on systemd. And while systemd&#x27;s license is free, may find it tends to suppress aspects of free software development by taking over and enclosing more and more system functionality.<p>If Trisquel were to dump systemd, I would seriously consider using it. My personal choice these days is Devuan (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;devuan.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;devuan.org&#x2F;</a>), the systemd-free variant of Debian., and I suggest you consider using it without the non-free components, instead of Trisquel.
评论 #29678799 未加载
theamk超过 3 年前
Those people are super shy about what their system is based on, which packages are available, and what is unique to Trisquel.<p>From what I could find out, it seems to be another Ubuntu-based system, but with all non-free parts disabled. Is there anything more to it?
评论 #29675163 未加载
评论 #29676051 未加载
velcrovan超过 3 年前
Another Linx distro catches up to the user experience of Windows for Workgroups
评论 #29675207 未加载