TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Copy Protection in Modern Microcontrollers (2001)

40 点作者 csh0超过 3 年前

2 条评论

userbinator超过 3 年前
"MCU break" services start at just under 1k$ and go up to a few k$ USD, the last time I checked. They're mostly based in the Far East (I'm not surprised at the author of this page) and while a lot of people may think "IP theft", they're very useful for right-to-repair, although at the higher end of the price range; if you have some old very expensive machinery to which the original company has long discontinued support or even no longer exists, the price doesn't seem so high anymore.
评论 #29742467 未加载
评论 #29742685 未加载
评论 #29749127 未加载
0xTJ超过 3 年前
You shouldn&#x27;t completely rely on the code you put out into the world in devices remaining secret. A sufficiently capable adversary will likely eventually get your data.<p>Whether you&#x27;re talking about a $0.30 MCU with the lock e-fuse programmed, or a several-hundred-dollar (or more) SoC with triple-redundant power-management&#x2F;security cores booting using unit-unique payload decryption keys burned into security fuses, the adversary might be able to get what you&#x27;re trying to protect.<p>How paranoid you want to be about readout protection will vary depending on your goals. If you want to do a decent job blocking reverse engineering of a product to impeded clones being produced, the lock bit might do the trick.
评论 #29743029 未加载