TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Would you pay for a service that actively protects privacy?

8 点作者 xfour超过 3 年前
Trying to get a sense of the perceived market outside my circle whether this is something worth putting in the hours necessary to reach an MVP.<p>I&#x27;m envisioning a suite of services including burner &amp; legal options, for example<p><pre><code> Throwaway &amp; forwarded email addresses Masked phone numbers Automated Opt-outs requests Delete my information requests </code></pre> And for checking companies compliance, creating a graph of the information that can be used to find pathways of where consumer information is being shared &#x2F; sold.<p>Price would likely be enough to cover some of the incidentals above in the 2-5$ USD range.

4 条评论

dhaavi超过 3 年前
We‘re way down this road, albeit with a different set of services, which you can find at safing.io<p>The biggest challenge we continue to face is how to make the value of privacy visible, as the privacy protection itself cannot be really seen by users.<p>A good example is brave with their „big numbers going up“ of blocked ads and saved bandwidth on the New Tab page.<p>If you can figure out how you can protect users _and_ make them feel that protection, they will pay for your service.<p>If things go forward with your idea, it would be nice to have a chat, if you’re up for it.
nradov超过 3 年前
I would consider paying, but there are already numerous services offering burner email addresses and phone numbers. Some are even free. What&#x27;s your unique value proposition?<p>And how will you prevent spammers from abusing your service?
评论 #29750275 未加载
yuppie_scum超过 3 年前
I feel like handing your privacy to a single source is a big risk in itself. What about when the “privacy co” gets breached?
评论 #29750843 未加载
wearta超过 3 年前
i would for sure