TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

A First Lesson in Econometrics (1970) [pdf]

145 点作者 hkc超过 3 年前

8 条评论

lowkeyokay超过 3 年前
This was made me laugh. So many times I read ‘it should then be obvious that…’ What the?! No it isn’t. Text book authors must hate students.
评论 #29800618 未加载
评论 #29798422 未加载
评论 #29798149 未加载
评论 #29804108 未加载
评论 #29807401 未加载
评论 #29799719 未加载
maccam912超过 3 年前
Was pleasantly surprised to find it a short humorous paper. If you want to learn econometrics, this will do more to prepare you for reading other papers than teach you anything.
评论 #29797915 未加载
ElDji超过 3 年前
Having followed engineering cursus THEN economics with econometry courses : this was the most WTF moments of my life.
rluoy超过 3 年前
It seems that ! is missing in equation (12).
评论 #29798005 未加载
评论 #29801279 未加载
imtringued超过 3 年前
Honestly, the first lesson in economics should be that there is no such thing as endless exponential growth.<p>This is a nice video that gets the point across: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;UI2Zs3QfzEI" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;UI2Zs3QfzEI</a>
评论 #29808097 未加载
motohagiography超过 3 年前
Funny, now do epidemiology.
tonmoy超过 3 年前
Equation 4 is obviously incorrect, right?
photochemsyn超过 3 年前
Econometrics is one of the most discredited branches of academics that exists. These were the people who were waving their models around in the early 1990s, trying to tell people that NAFTA would have no effect on manufacturing jobs in the United States. They also promoted elimination of Glass-Steagall and the deregulation of the housing market, resulting in the subprime fraud-based economic disaster of 2008.<p>There&#x27;s a reason the neoclassical economists are hidden away in business schools, not in the actual science departments - it&#x27;s because they&#x27;d have to endure the ridicule of anyone with basic training in science and math. When your models predict the opposite of what actually occurs, time and time again, well, you&#x27;re supposed to recognize that there are fundamental flaws in them and go back to basics.<p>Imagine if, in the late 1970s, all the climate researchers had predicted several decades of global cooling thanks to human activity, and had turned out to be entirely wrong, yet made no effort to re-examine their basic assumptions about how the world works. That&#x27;s what neoclassical economists are doing with their econometric model nonsense.
评论 #29800517 未加载
评论 #29800350 未加载
评论 #29800608 未加载
评论 #29803498 未加载
评论 #29808460 未加载
评论 #29800984 未加载
评论 #29799965 未加载