2010, but interesting.<p><i>“Who will be around then to be bored by this apparent overpowering eventual tedium?” A thought occurred. If, by then, only massless particles are present (the rest having decayed), Penrose reasoned that eternity will pass in a flash since no proper time elapses at all for these voyagers along space-time light-cones.</i><p>Edit: the review of Penrose's book is by Julian Barbour, who concludes with his own thought:<p><i>Despite his great attraction to conformal geometry, Penrose still accords length a real physical role. But in fact we only ever observe angles, never lengths as such. Do we really need them?</i><p>Or, as Pauli said, "Your idea is crazy, but is it crazy enough?"