The post reads as if investors are these unicorn creatures who hold the balance of power - they must be pitched with optimum precision otherwise you'll go no where.<p>The reality is investors need deal flow and want to learn about new companies, especially associates and non-partners.<p><i>"if the nicest thing they can say about your company is that it “sounds interesting”, the intro isn’t going to go anywhere."</i><p>Depends on who's writing "sounds interesting", frankly. If it is a successful founder of a portfolio company or entrepreneur who exited with a nice return for the fund, that might be a great seal of approval.<p>Which leads me to the main reason I still agree with the premise of not asking for introductions - and that is a VC/investor's contact network acts as a gatekeeper for good deals. And so if I'm in that privileged position, I don't want to use up my social capital helping friends with bum-deal companies get introductions. So please don't ask me to.<p>Sadly, that wasn't really mentioned in the article.