TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Stop the California Solar Tax

28 点作者 wanderr超过 3 年前

5 条评论

Andys超过 3 年前
Australia was an early mass adopter of suburban rooftop solar and a similar issue played out here.<p>It turns out that the cost of building and maintaining the grid is the majority of the cost of electricity to the home. As the cost of actual kWh trends to zero, the cost of the grid becomes the dominant cost.<p>If households with solar want to use the grid effectively as a battery, that has a defined and quite high cost, and has to be paid no matter how you structure it (monthly fee, tax, etc)
评论 #29909243 未加载
invalidname超过 3 年前
This is Tesla trying to get the tax payers to fund the rich: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nrdc.org&#x2F;experts&#x2F;mohit-chhabra&#x2F;debunking-myths-surrounding-californias-net-metering-reform" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nrdc.org&#x2F;experts&#x2F;mohit-chhabra&#x2F;debunking-myths-s...</a><p>The fact is that this tax will help solar and help poorer families make money from it. Instead of subsidies going to the rich.
评论 #29912649 未加载
评论 #29917953 未加载
afrazkhan超过 3 年前
As a European, I have to ask the obvious question: What?<p>People are being charged for having solar panels? I understand there needs to be a fee for hooking up to the grid etc., but I think here you get that and more back by feeding excess energy to it.<p>Could residence of those states get off the grid and instead install many large batteries?<p>I don&#x27;t know a lot about this stuff :)
评论 #29906171 未加载
stickfigure超过 3 年前
Wow, this would hit me and be really expensive. What&#x27;s the argument for it?
评论 #29902648 未加载
评论 #29902631 未加载
cc101超过 3 年前
As I recall, politics is banned from HN.
评论 #29903088 未加载
评论 #29902628 未加载
评论 #29902736 未加载
评论 #29902919 未加载
评论 #29902611 未加载