TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Graphical User Interface History

72 点作者 brendanfalk超过 3 年前

8 条评论

marcodiego超过 3 年前
&gt; GNOME and KDE<p>Screenshot provided is neither GNOME nor KDE, it is WindowMaker. Most screenshots in the article have terrible resolution. A better site to see history of GUI is: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;toastytech.com&#x2F;guis&#x2F;index.html" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;toastytech.com&#x2F;guis&#x2F;index.html</a>
评论 #29965227 未加载
评论 #29966613 未加载
Blahagun超过 3 年前
Although many people might have not seen most of the GUIs in this article, the article is also horribly wrong on some of them. The screenshot for KDE&#x2F;GNOME has absolutely nothing to do with KDE&#x2F;GNOME (besides maybe if you wanted to use Window Maker as a window manager during the early versions of GNOME where it didn&#x27;t really have its own window manager).<p>The article constantly misspells &quot;X Window&quot; as &quot;X Windows&quot; which for anyone who has even a small interest of GUIs through the years may find incredibly irritating.<p>But the cherry on top is the absolutely outrageous lie that OSX was introduced with the Mac transition from PowerPC to Intel. This is just ridiculous.<p>I don&#x27;t know much of the other GUIs and I can not comment if they too were horribly represented.
petilon超过 3 年前
Newton OS, PalmOS and General Magic&#x27;s Magic Cap are significant omissions in this history.<p>And of course, iOS and Android.
评论 #29965776 未加载
gduzan超过 3 年前
No love for the GUI on the Symbolics Lisp Machine?
评论 #29965853 未加载
评论 #29965485 未加载
drewcoo超过 3 年前
In the Mother of All Demos[1], Engelbart&#x27;s 5-key contraption is a &quot;chorded keyboard,&quot; an idea that resurfaces from time to time. Engelbart also talked about UI for trained adults vs the kind of GUI we are used to today, designed for children. The difference in design based on intended use both in the mechanical inputs and in the display are incredibly important. One would hope that similar ideas shape designs today.<p>There is no mention of PLATO[2] whatsoever.<p>And I stopped scanning. Maybe this is intended as a &quot;personal history&quot; of GUIs, but otherwise, it&#x27;s lacking.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;invention.si.edu&#x2F;mother-all-demos" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;invention.si.edu&#x2F;mother-all-demos</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;PLATO_(computer_system)" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;PLATO_(computer_system)</a>
评论 #29965510 未加载
评论 #29963819 未加载
评论 #29964248 未加载
rbanffy超过 3 年前
Absent a good definition of what a GUI is, I&#x27;m unsure a list like this could ever aspire to be complete. Does a GUI need to allow you to launch a program? Did Quattro Pro for DOS had a GUI?
chrisallick超过 3 年前
you might enjoy In The Beginning Was The Command Line by Neil Stephenson. Author of Diamond Age and Snowcrash.
HellDunkel超过 3 年前
Funny how the early Windows OS did not even use a graphics mode but used ascii symbols to render windows.
评论 #29965137 未加载
评论 #29964441 未加载