TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Adblocking Does Not Constitute Copyright Infringement, Court Rules

64 点作者 skarz超过 3 年前

6 条评论

jqpabc123超过 3 年前
Bottom line: You own your computer and you pay for your communication bandwidth and what is allowed to make use of it is entirely your decision.<p>Advertisers don&#x27;t own your computer desktop and have no real right to dictate what happens on it --- much to their chagrin.<p>The most amazing part is that it was even necessary for a court to make this ruling. Anything less would have given advertisers partial ownership rights to your attention span.
评论 #29991974 未加载
评论 #30014312 未加载
DangitBobby超过 3 年前
This is a concern:<p>&gt; In its lawsuit, Axel Springer cited a 2012 court ruling which found that software for Sony’s Playstation Portable console that changed code in memory to facilitate cheating was infringing. In that case the court found that the temporary modification of the software constituted a revision of the software, something which requires permission from rightsholders.<p>How can it be against copyright the modify my personal copy of a game? If I cut out the all of the faces of an actor on a VHS tape and replace it with mine, is that copyright infringement? It&#x27;s my copy.
评论 #29991057 未加载
buzzwords超过 3 年前
I have very little knowledge of how legal systems work.<p>Can someone explain what happens when a company as large as this decides to file such a law suit?<p>Is it such low costs that you might as well just argue whatever you want and see what happens? Or are there internal teams counter arguing to check validity of such law suit?
评论 #29991732 未加载
kazinator超过 3 年前
Adblocking hyper-confirms to copyright: you don&#x27;t download the ad, therefore you&#x27;re not copying, using or redistributing it.<p>Copyright law does not support the idea that you <i>must</i> fetch a copy of a work and look at it.
评论 #29993105 未加载
35mm_guy超过 3 年前
To give some context: The court Hamburg is the equvalent of filing your claims in the Eastern District of Texas.<p>It&#x27;s quite remarkeable that they didn&#x27;t rule that adblocking is copyright infringement...
anfilt超过 3 年前
Good to hear, what I find more inserting was the case the plaintiff referenced. The fact a court ruled modifying code in memory is copyright infringement is sad.