TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

OSS authors:“We need to understand your mitigation plans for this vulnerability”

75 点作者 jonathanzufi超过 3 年前

3 条评论

progbits超过 3 年前
I have read a good theory for this elsewhere: the company has a spreadsheet of &quot;partners&quot; somewhere that legal and accounting demands gets updated. It starts as companies which you pay but then someone insists developers add all the open source copyright owners.<p>Now someone took this spreadsheet with zero understanding of what curl&#x2F;&quot;Haxx Team&quot; is and just emailed them a template.<p>Not giving excuses, clearly they are incompetent. But it is not some demand of service from freeloaders.
评论 #30037395 未加载
评论 #30037626 未加载
评论 #30037515 未加载
评论 #30036017 未加载
newaccount74超过 3 年前
I keep getting questionaires like this, usually from paying customers though. I never answer them because my licenses are way too cheap to bother with shit like this. And yet the companies keep using my software, despite the fact that I didn&#x27;t answer their stupid vendor asessment forms.<p>At this point I wonder what these forms are good for? Why send them to vendors and waste people&#x27;s time if you don&#x27;t care about the answer anyway?
评论 #30038614 未加载
评论 #30046161 未加载
评论 #30037677 未加载
toomuchtodo超过 3 年前
Should’ve named the company and not redacted the doc.
评论 #30040522 未加载