TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Google Is Forcing Me to Dump a Perfectly Good Phone

855 点作者 ciprian_craciun超过 3 年前

130 条评论

captn3m0超过 3 年前
I wrote a thread[0] on Pixel 3 (trying to convince Google to extend the support) a few months before it went EoL[3] (Oct &#x27;21). Here&#x27;s the important bits:<p>- 10M+ Pixel 3 devices that were sold worldwide<p>- 72% of Pixel 3&#x27;s estimated lifecycle emissions are from its manufacturing[1]. Using your phone is _not the source of most of the emissions during a phone&#x27;s lifecycle_.<p>- It has gotten worse over time, but Google hasn&#x27;t offered better guaranttes. Pixel 5&#x27;s emissions-over-lifetime are 30% higher than that of Pixel 3.<p>The alleged reason Google can&#x27;t offer support beyond 3 years is because of Google&#x27;s dependence on Qualcomm for the support[2]. Apparently Qualcomm asks for a ridiculous amount of money to support any chip beyond a measly 2-3 years. Apple gets away with it by building their own chips, and Pixel 6 is guaranteed to be supported for 5 years as a result.<p>However, the fact that Google - one of the world&#x27;s richest corporation can&#x27;t convince or pay Qualcomm to support a perfectly functional device in 2022 is astonishing.<p>[0]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;captn3m0&#x2F;status&#x2F;1427908406086553601" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;captn3m0&#x2F;status&#x2F;1427908406086553601</a><p>[1]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;storage.googleapis.com&#x2F;mannequin&#x2F;sustainability&#x2F;reports-2018&#x2F;Sustainability_PrintReport_Pixel3.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;storage.googleapis.com&#x2F;mannequin&#x2F;sustainability&#x2F;repo...</a><p>[2]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arstechnica.com&#x2F;gadgets&#x2F;2021&#x2F;03&#x2F;the-fairphone-2-hits-five-years-of-updates-with-some-help-from-lineageos&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arstechnica.com&#x2F;gadgets&#x2F;2021&#x2F;03&#x2F;the-fairphone-2-hits...</a><p>[3]: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;endoflife.date&#x2F;pixel" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;endoflife.date&#x2F;pixel</a>
评论 #30075970 未加载
评论 #30076060 未加载
评论 #30075420 未加载
评论 #30076704 未加载
评论 #30075385 未加载
评论 #30075646 未加载
评论 #30075491 未加载
评论 #30079756 未加载
评论 #30075209 未加载
评论 #30077197 未加载
评论 #30075321 未加载
评论 #30080821 未加载
评论 #30075459 未加载
评论 #30078090 未加载
评论 #30080843 未加载
评论 #30082274 未加载
评论 #30079392 未加载
评论 #30075552 未加载
totalZero超过 3 年前
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. I had a Nexus 6P and after that experience I promised myself that I will never buy a Google hardware device ever again. The company has the wrong mentality regarding its handsets and how to take care of the customers who buy them.
评论 #30074793 未加载
评论 #30074652 未加载
评论 #30074975 未加载
评论 #30074581 未加载
评论 #30077869 未加载
评论 #30074777 未加载
评论 #30074955 未加载
评论 #30077167 未加载
评论 #30095344 未加载
评论 #30074554 未加载
评论 #30076215 未加载
评论 #30079569 未加载
评论 #30076656 未加载
评论 #30074562 未加载
tablespoon超过 3 年前
Honestly, Google needs really needs to do better. Samsung has raised the bar by supporting its devices with 4 years of patches: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theverge.com&#x2F;2021&#x2F;2&#x2F;22&#x2F;22295639&#x2F;samsung-galaxy-device-2019-four-years-security-updates" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theverge.com&#x2F;2021&#x2F;2&#x2F;22&#x2F;22295639&#x2F;samsung-galaxy-d...</a>. And frankly, how hard&#x2F;expensive would it be to support these devices for <i>far</i> longer? Google is a massive company, and I see little reason why that can&#x27;t employ a team of devs backporting patches to older phones. Current versions of Windows and Linux run happily on decades-old hardware, so a phone should at least be able to get patches for known security issues for a decade. Dev resources would be far better spent on this than yet another hamfisted attempt to build a messenger app that they&#x27;ll kill in a couple years anyway.
评论 #30078534 未加载
评论 #30075183 未加载
评论 #30075275 未加载
评论 #30075136 未加载
评论 #30075181 未加载
sulam超过 3 年前
Google has actually started extending its security update policy for its hardware to 5 years. I don&#x27;t know what &quot;enough&quot; is, but as someone who has to do these updates (ironically, for Fitbit devices, yes we are owned by Google now) I will say that continuing to ship updates for products you shipped 5 years ago is far from trivial. It forces you to develop in ways that are not natural for people that work with hardware (the natural thing is to branch per product, but good luck managing that if you need to land a security fix on the 15 or so products we shipped in the last 5 years). This is manageable now that we&#x27;re owned by Google, but prior to the acquisition it was a serious drain on my team. And folks on my team would tell you that they don&#x27;t love it even today -- having to support 5-yr old MCUs when you&#x27;re trying to keep your BOM down can be very challenging, especially managing available memory.
评论 #30076549 未加载
评论 #30075174 未加载
评论 #30075009 未加载
评论 #30076854 未加载
评论 #30076220 未加载
评论 #30075127 未加载
评论 #30077073 未加载
paxys超过 3 年前
It&#x27;s bizarre that a company like Google doesn&#x27;t realize that supporting older devices actually helps them in the long term. Apple has the most dedicated customer base in the world who will gladly upgrade all their devices every year or two, yet even 6-8 year old iPhones and iPads regularly get software updates. This increases the value of Apple devices across the board and sustains a very large resale marketplace. This means more people are coming into the Apple ecosystem at the low end and eventually working their way up.<p>If I know that my $900 purchase is going to be worthless in 2-3 years, why will I even bother?
评论 #30075441 未加载
评论 #30075719 未加载
JohnTHaller超过 3 年前
LineageOS supports the Google Pixel 3 with LineageOS 18.1 (aka Android 11). It&#x27;s definitely worth giving this a shot and you can revert to the standard Google release if you&#x27;d like. Word of warning on Verizon devices, though. If you bought from Verizon, they generally place an OEM lock on it. So, the device is &quot;unlocked&quot; in terms of carrier, but locked in terms of OS. Don&#x27;t buy Pixels from Verizon.<p>How To: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wiki.lineageos.org&#x2F;devices&#x2F;blueline&#x2F;install" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wiki.lineageos.org&#x2F;devices&#x2F;blueline&#x2F;install</a><p>Download: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;download.lineageos.org&#x2F;blueline" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;download.lineageos.org&#x2F;blueline</a>
评论 #30075475 未加载
评论 #30075389 未加载
评论 #30083015 未加载
评论 #30082317 未加载
ng12超过 3 年前
I recently switched to an iPhone 12 for this reason. It&#x27;s been almost a year and I still hate iOS. It&#x27;s significantly dumber than Android and has some truly baffling UX choices. However, the phone is undeniably better than any Android phone I&#x27;ve ever used so I can&#x27;t convince myself to switch back.
评论 #30075290 未加载
评论 #30083083 未加载
Kique超过 3 年前
As a current Pixel 3 user, I think this article is slightly hyperbolic. The phone still works great other than a worse battery, definitely not &quot;garbage&quot;. The author is making it sound like the phone stops working. But then again I still use Windows 7 which also doesn&#x27;t have security updates.
评论 #30074856 未加载
评论 #30075189 未加载
评论 #30074796 未加载
评论 #30077316 未加载
评论 #30075030 未加载
评论 #30075555 未加载
jmnicolas超过 3 年前
&gt; “We find that three years of security and OS updates still provides users with a great experience for their device.”<p>What about the 4th year?<p>It&#x27;s ludicrous to throw a perfectly functioning thing to buy a new one just because the gazillion dollar company behind it needs to make even more money without regard to the environment (oh but rest assured the next version will be 5% greener ... yeah right).<p>My Pixel 4 XL will be EOLed at the end of the year (bought it in January 2020) and I&#x27;m torn between security and wastefulness.
评论 #30075255 未加载
danuker超过 3 年前
Funny how LineageOS can afford to support the Pixel 3, while Google can not.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wiki.lineageos.org&#x2F;devices&#x2F;#google" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wiki.lineageos.org&#x2F;devices&#x2F;#google</a>
评论 #30075305 未加载
评论 #30075237 未加载
taspeotis超过 3 年前
iPhone 5S<p>First released September 20, 2013; 8 years ago<p>Operating system iOS 12.5.5, released September 23, 2021<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;IPhone_5S" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;IPhone_5S</a>
c7DJTLrn超过 3 年前
Where is the f&#x27;ing legislation forcing these companies to provide software updates for a number of years? The e-waste this kind of abandonment creates is unimaginable. I&#x27;m so frustrated that my government continues to do jack shit about issues like this that really matter and instead tries to ban encryption every six months.
评论 #30076692 未加载
评论 #30077761 未加载
评论 #30080619 未加载
评论 #30075739 未加载
donatj超过 3 年前
My 3a XL has been completely and totally bug-ridden since upgrading to Android 12. I have used Android for the last 12+ years across inumerable phones, and this is the worst Android experience I have ever had.<p>- Sometimes I&#x27;ll unlock my phone and the stupid new fade in effect gets stuck half way and my phone screen will just be dark until I sleep&#x2F;unsleep.<p>- Sometimes the buttons in my top menu decided to just not render, like yesterday when I was under my car trying to activate the flashlight. Requires a full restart.<p>- The Google Assistant crashes <i>every single time</i> I try to use it, and I&#x27;m a big fan&#x2F;user of Google Assistant. I just can&#x27;t use Google Assistant. She goes to reply and it just dies mid reply. Every. Single. Time.<p>- So much more little crap. My phone has become completely unreliable.<p>When I got the OTA upgrade 6-ish months ago I was certain &quot;oh, Google will fix these problems in no time.&quot; My phone is very quickly reaching EOL and I suspect Google is not going to fix any of this.<p>I am, for the first time, contemplating switching to iOS.
评论 #30082345 未加载
ubermonkey超过 3 年前
My god, I&#x27;d heard that Android support over time was not great, but 3 years? That&#x27;s really, really short.<p>I&#x27;m a gadget nut, so for a long time I got a new phone every 18-24 months -- and for most of that time, the year over year gains on phones were sufficient to justify the upgrade, at least for some users.<p>But we&#x27;re in a more mature market now. YoY updates on phones are pretty incremental. I kept my iPhone 8 for about 3 years before handing it off to my wife (who, lest you think me a jerk, absolutely DID NOT WANT to spend the money on a new phone for her), who then used it for almost 2 more years.<p>The phone I replaced it with is an 11Pro. I expect to get AT LEAST 3 years out of it. (What finally tempted me out of the 8 was the camera, which I assume is a common story no matter which kind of phone you like -- they got a LOT better between 2016 and 2019.)<p>Pixels are high-end Android handsets, right? I would have assumed that they&#x27;d have similar useful lives; I don&#x27;t blame Android folks for being up in arms, because sunsetting a 3 year old handset is just BANANAS.
评论 #30083233 未加载
throw10920超过 3 年前
Everyone always talks about how, with Google&#x27;s free web services, &quot;you get what you pay for&quot; - however, Google&#x27;s hardware division seems to be aspiring to reach that same quality standard as the rest of the company:<p>&gt; In response to an email asking Google why it stopped supporting the Pixel 3, a Googles spokesperson said, “We find that three years of security and OS updates still provides users with a great experience for their device.”
solidrake超过 3 年前
How long should they provide software updates for? 3-years? 5-years? 10-years? What would be an acceptable cut off date for providing updates? I wouldn&#x27;t expect companies to provide updates for their old hardware forever, but what would be an acceptable date that will benefit both consumers and the company itself.
评论 #30074751 未加载
评论 #30074734 未加载
评论 #30075058 未加载
评论 #30074686 未加载
评论 #30075197 未加载
评论 #30074659 未加载
评论 #30074877 未加载
评论 #30075086 未加载
评论 #30075497 未加载
评论 #30075154 未加载
评论 #30077135 未加载
robocat超过 3 年前
&gt; then you’re vulnerable to every security flaw discovered since your last patch.<p>You do continue to get security updates to Chrome and Google Play Services for many years. The App Store and other external systems may protect you from some other vulnerabilities.<p>An iPhone gets updates for longer, but the cheapest iPhone costs 3x the price of the Nokia phone I have, so only comparing support period is nonsense. I buy a cheap phone so they are cheap to replace (broken&#x2F;stolen&#x2F;lost, often when travelling).<p>&gt; For millions of years, these metals formed underground<p>Also geological and biological processes on the surface: some ores are formed underground but some are not. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Ore_genesis" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Ore_genesis</a>
brendoelfrendo超过 3 年前
Am I taking crazy pills? Everyone here is saying &quot;Yeah, but how long should we ask them to produce updates? Let&#x27;s not be unreasonable.&quot;<p>People, the mobile hardware ecosystem is fundamentally broken. On my desktop PC, I can keep upgrading Windows versions until the hardware craps out. I can move to Linux if Windows doesn&#x27;t run well or has some functionality that&#x27;s not compatible with my machine. There&#x27;s an already existing model, but we don&#x27;t apply it to mobile and we suffer through these locked-down ecosystems where Qualcomm and other hardware providers have the final say in when your hardware becomes unsupportable.<p>The answer to the question of &quot;how long should we expect Google to provide updates for a device?&quot; is to reject the question and say &quot;why can&#x27;t Google just release the software that I then install on my device?&quot;<p>If the answer to that question is &quot;well, because the devices are locked down and a software company can&#x27;t actually make platform-agnostic software in this environment,&quot; that&#x27;s a <i>problem.</i>
elif超过 3 年前
I&#x27;m really surprised at the lack of support for recent pixel models... especially considering how terrible the pixel 6 release has been.<p>For the first week I couldn&#x27;t get it to charge because they didn&#x27;t include a power brick and my existing power bricks, my PC&#x27;s USB ports, etc. would charge slower than the battery discharged by sitting idle talking to 5G towers. Like literally plugged in with screen off it would drain the battery.<p>Then the second week there were 2 days where my phone calls would fail to complete on my end but continue to ring on the other end. Really annoyingly frustrating failure mode.<p>To top it all off, they removed the toggle for turning off the cell modem.. You have to open up a menu every time you want to change internet types.<p>I&#x27;ve loved the pixel 2 so much it lasted until now... but google seems to be turning into the bloated carrier they tried to displace by launching fi.
intrasight超过 3 年前
Two thoughts:<p>1. Just get a new phone every two years. Sell or donate the old one. It&#x27;s not being &quot;dumped&quot;. Or keep as your backup phone.<p>2. As the owner of a 2004 Volvo who will soon be looking for a new car, should I be concerned that the same issues will soon plague cars? Have they already?
评论 #30075268 未加载
评论 #30076696 未加载
g051051超过 3 年前
All too common. I&#x27;ve had several devices (iPad, iPhone, iPod Touch) killed because Apple stopped providing any sort of software support until practically everything I used them for bitrotted away. The only old Apple device I have that still works fine is my iPod Nano, since it&#x27;s too dumb to have this problem.<p>I also have had to replace two otherwise pristine phones as 2G (Motorola Razr) and 3G (iPhone 5) services were discontinued, so there&#x27;s that too.
alyandon超过 3 年前
My Pixel 2 will be the last Google phone I own. I really shouldn&#x27;t continue using it but since I take excellent care of my electronics it works just as well as the day I bought it so I&#x27;m reluctant to ditch it until it actually develops problems.<p>It&#x27;s going to be far more cost effective for me to move to an iPhone and I never thought I&#x27;d ever say something like that non-ironically.
评论 #30075469 未加载
评论 #30080929 未加载
gitowiec超过 3 年前
I&#x27;m using Samsung galaxy s8. I&#x27;m 3rd owner of it. Immediately when I got it almost 2 years ago I rooted it disabling my self to obtain latest updates for this phone. And I&#x27;m not whining about it loud.... I just don&#x27;t get it why someone had to write about losing updates whole article? There are more important problems (real one)
hughrr超过 3 年前
This is why I buy iPhones.<p>My mother has my old 2015 iPhone 6s. It runs latest iOS 15. Got a new battery at an apple store in under an hour mid last year. Looks like it just came out of the box.<p>It’s over 6 years old now.
julianlam超过 3 年前
Doesn&#x27;t Google publish the images for their phone, making it easier to load custom ROMs?<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.androidauthority.com&#x2F;unlock-pixel-3-bootloader-915961&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.androidauthority.com&#x2F;unlock-pixel-3-bootloader-9...</a><p>Then<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;lineageosroms.com&#x2F;blueline&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;lineageosroms.com&#x2F;blueline&#x2F;</a><p>Done, now your phone will be supported damn near forever.<p>----<p>I get that Google themselves should be supporting their phones for longer. I completely agree. I just can at least say that they&#x27;ve given you the tools to still use the phone after the updates stop.<p>That&#x27;s a damn sight better than other manufacturers... e.g. Nokia 6, the bootloader is locked, and I had to pay some kid in some random country to unlock it for me with his reverse engineered tool.<p>So no, I give Google a lot of shit about their behaviour, but phone updates? Could be longer but I won&#x27;t hold them to it.
评论 #30075004 未加载
评论 #30075265 未加载
freebreakfast超过 3 年前
&gt; The planned obsolescence is frustrating enough, and I’m certainly annoyed that I have to spend hundreds of dollars on a new phone when I really shouldn’t have to.<p>You don&#x27;t have to spend hundreds of dollars on a new phone. That&#x27;s the problem. We don&#x27;t need these things. We want these things.
评论 #30076643 未加载
评论 #30076882 未加载
Sunspark超过 3 年前
If security updates were truly that critical, Google would push a play services update that would immediately kill all Google service connectivity to underscore that a no-longer-supported device is forbidden to use and force everyone in poorer countries to go forth and purchase a new one.
ocdtrekkie超过 3 年前
I think it&#x27;s time someone ask if Google&#x27;s vaunted claims about being carbon neutral count all of the Android and Chromebook hardware that Google forces consumers to discard due to their poor support lifecycle. I think they hide the sheer environmental waste tsunami behind third party manufacturing.<p>(tbh, this might be a good area to kill two birds with one law&#x2F;stone: Force companies to account in their environmental impact for decisions which drop product support. Dropping updates from a hardware model then is weighted by the carbon cost of all of them in use. As governments turn the screws on environmental regulations, this may also help product support lifecycles and more long-lived products.)
评论 #30075422 未加载
rhengles超过 3 年前
Reading only the title, I thought &quot;I am having this problem exactly now!&quot;. However, it is not about lack of security updates (it&#x27;s an old Motorola phone). It is a smartphone that belonged to my late father who passed away in 2020. He had a google account with password and the phone has a pattern to draw in the lock screen.<p>I know Google and the phone manufacturers are concerned with the stealing of phones, so they make it as hard as they can to use a phone without authorization, even if you try to reset the phone and erase all user data. Does anyone know if there is a process to remove a google account from a phone even if I have to prove to Google that he died of natural causes?
United857超过 3 年前
Perhaps for an end user, but from a developer POV, the Pixels are some of the most developer friendly Android devices -- very easily rooted, little unnecessary bloatware by default compared to the likes of Samsung, Huawei etc.
评论 #30077828 未加载
jlkuester7超过 3 年前
Until last month I was still happily running a Google Nexus 6. For the past 5 years, I have been getting regular updates for it via Lineage OS (running Android 11 now). The only reason I had to stop using it is because the cell networks in the US are dropping support for its radio hardware.<p>Still using my Nexus 7 tablet from 2013 (running Android 11 via Lineage OS). Huge shout-out to the awesome folks at Lineage who are keeping these devices viable for years!<p>Honestly, when I went to buy a new phone, one of the biggest factors I considered was if it was popular enough with the custom-ROM crowed to be supported long-term...
billpg超过 3 年前
My Windows machine is something like 5 years old. Microsoft will keep supporting it until 2025 and even by then I will probably have switched it to Windows 11.<p>Smartphones go unsupported after a few years? Why do we put up with this?
newfonewhodis超过 3 年前
I kept my OG Pixel for 5 years and had the battery replaced twice (2.5 years and ~4 years in). It worked fine until the last moment when it just died on me (like, absolutely bricked).<p>I stopped getting software updates after 3 years but the hardware continued to be very capable until the very end. The battery was expected to degrade after some time, and the phone didn&#x27;t feel as snappy with modern apps, but it was perfectly fine as a phone.<p>I&#x27;m now on a Pixel 5 and expect to go through something similar. It is absurd to me that people switch phones every 2-3 years (or even annually).
rock_artist超过 3 年前
The main problem is SoC lock-ins. You can find aftermarket AOSP for Android devices.<p>Sadly it&#x27;s inferior of the days where you can run a mainline OS on 20 year old device (eg. it is possible to run 32bit Windows 10 on first Intel MacBook from 2006).<p>Another thing is apps, usually us developers drop &quot;legacy&quot; OSes as it&#x27;s hard to support them (or worse a mobile store enforces dropping such support). So someone with old phone can&#x27;t even use it anymore.<p>There are some &quot;open-source&quot; SoC or more environmental&#x2F;reusable approaches but it&#x27;s just a drop in the ocean.
rickspencer3超过 3 年前
If you want to run a phone effectively forever, I am afraid that you need to turn to the free software community, and give up a lot in terms of app compatibility and the many other benefits of living within a mainstream ecosystem. Going the Free Software route is not easy in my experience.<p>The good news is, one of the great benefits of Pixel phones has always been that the boot loader is unlocked. So, realistically, you can run your phone as long as you want. There are many Free options to keep that going, if that is truly what you value.
frouge超过 3 年前
Guys, we&#x27;re all frequent readers of HN here and it&#x27;s pretty clear Google is not a company that we can trust. Data privacy, product stoppage, advertisement collusion, their search engine becoming an ad engine, obsolescence, monopoly, we&#x27;re talking about a company that collects huge fines every 6 months. There is nothing good in Google World, so please, let&#x27;s all change the world together and stop using the services of inhuman companies.
评论 #30075388 未加载
webmaven超过 3 年前
I currently have a Pixel 5a. I got it via the Google Fi &quot;Subscribe and Save&quot; option, which works out to a pretty decent discount from the retail price on top of paying it in installments over 2 years.<p>I don&#x27;t know how many of these subscriptions Google is selling, but it will be interesting to see what happens in when a bunch of Google Fi customers start becoming eligible for their upgrade to a new phone subscription around November 2023.<p>Will customers upgrade immediately to the then presumably extant &#x27;Pixel 7a&#x27;, or wait?<p>If customers wait for the next (hypothetically, a &#x27;Pixel 8a&#x27;) model to come out, will that actually be offered as an upgrade, or will the upgrade offer stick to the older model for a while?<p>Because of these unknowns, the calculation the customers have to make is interesting: On the one hand, the 5a should still have almost another year of updates, so <i>not</i> upgrading immediately is viable and saves money, and if you wait your upgrade may be to a newer phone.<p>But, if the &#x27;7a&#x27; remains the upgrade offer for a while even after the &#x27;8a&#x27; comes out, what is gained from maxing out the life of the 5a phone at the tail end is lost from shortening the life of the &#x27;8a&#x27; upgrade from the head end.
M2Ys4U超过 3 年前
I just bought a new phone because OnePlus just stopped supporting my 6T which was released in November 2018, so for all intents and purposes 3 years ago as well.<p>It was (well, is, I&#x27;m still using it while I await its replacement) a perfectly good phone aside from some wear on the USB-C port which I would have had serviced had this not happened.<p>Frankly, if manufacturers aren&#x27;t willing to continue to offer support for these devices they should just stop making phones.
userbinator超过 3 年前
It says a <i>lot</i> about corporate brainwashing and propaganda when the comment here asking &quot;Is it really a security risk?&quot; is flagged dead and downvoted to hell. They really found the perfect excuse to squeeze users into increasingly authoritarian &quot;upgrades&quot; and gradual loss of control.<p>The only security is really for their profits, not for you.<p>Once you realise, the truth will set you free. No wonder they&#x27;re scared.
ccouzens超过 3 年前
I think about phone updates as layers in a stack.<p>At the lowest level of the stack we have software written in literal ROM. As such, it can&#x27;t be updated without switching out the hardware. For an example of a vulnerability here search for &quot;iPhone Checkm8&quot;. No doubt there are examples in the Android ecosystem too.<p>Next layer up there are operating system updates. Unfortunately these are hard to compare across ecosystems as the scope of what an operating system is is poorly defined. Things like the web browser, HTLM rendering engine and SMS app are part of the iOS operating system. But on Android they&#x27;re just apps and are updated the same as any other app.<p>At the top of the stack we have app updates.<p>Knowing what might contain known unpatched vulnerabilities helps me determine my risk and behaviours to combat it. For example I may not be comfortable running disreputable apps on an unpatched operating system. But on the same phone I may not worry about visiting websites as the browser is up to date.<p>Personally I use web apps as much as possible and native apps as little as possible, so most of the security issues that affect old phones don&#x27;t concern me.
mindslight超过 3 年前
The entire mobile ecosystem is an insecure exploitative dumpster fire. People are way too willing to trust it, because companies spend billions of dollars on advertising to push it. But ultimately you should do the least amount of computing possible with it, and favor traditional user-representing PC operating systems that have been developed over decades.<p>&gt; <i>Installing security updates is the one basic thing everyone needs to do for their own digital security</i><p>This is only true to the extent that you trust a device. My phone is <i>way</i> down on my trust DAG. When I setup services for it to access (eg rsync or CalDAV), I basically consider it an attacker. It is a herolte that stopped receiving microG&#x2F;Lineage updates, but continues working alright for my purposes. Would it bother me if a drive by attacker got ad hoc access to my occasional usage? Of course. But they&#x27;re nowhere near positioned to exploit my information as much as the Advanced Persistent Threats that the phone shipped with would have!<p>Furthermore most exploits are going to require interaction, so if you aren&#x27;t browsing websites on the phone then staying patched matters even less. Of course you have to avoid giving in to the massive temptation of the surveillance industry pushing you to do all these things in your phone. They do this precisely <i>because</i> it is one of the least secure environments and thus they can better exploit you - you&#x27;re not particularly thinking about opsec when you&#x27;re relaxing on the couch.<p>But alas the upgrade treadmill still marches on and it looks like I will have to upgrade that phone if I keep wanting native voice, due to the looming AT&amp;T 4G deprecation. Although I&#x27;m tempted to just keep on using it with VOIP-over-data because the less money going to that fetid ecosystem the better.
karolist超过 3 年前
Still using Pixel 3XL, perfectly good phone with a processor that is faster at multicore than that in Pixel 5. I&#x27;m with the author here, sad to see this perfectly good phone getting obsoleted artificially.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;browser.geekbench.com&#x2F;android_devices&#x2F;google-pixel-3-xl" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;browser.geekbench.com&#x2F;android_devices&#x2F;google-pixel-3...</a>
beebmam超过 3 年前
I still use a Pixel 2 as my phone and I had no idea it was EoL. I&#x27;ve been using this thing for more a year after it is apparently not getting security updates. That&#x27;s extremely fucked up that this isn&#x27;t communicated to users. Many people I know are using androids that are totally out of date. This is a giant security concern I now have for our society.
bbarn超过 3 年前
For all the talk about replacing these every 3-4 years, I think I&#x27;d be a lot less upset if every 3 years actually felt like an upgrade. A slightly bigger screen, a 10% better camera, less buttons? Why do I need a new one? Apple may be getting a lot of positive credit in this department, but, by and large, what&#x27;s the difference between an 11 and a 13? The incremental hardware differences are so small it&#x27;s easy for them to build on the same OS over time. Google used to be my go to, and the google devices especially because they were more &quot;vanilla&quot; android at the time. I left a few years ago because google branded devices were so similar to Samsung (Samsung even manufacturing many of the &quot;Nexus&quot; devices at the time) that the vanilla feeling was fading away.<p>Is there even a &quot;stock&quot; android option anymore? I honestly can&#x27;t say as I&#x27;ve just bought into Apple&#x27;s stuff for overall device compatibility with my other stuff.
fleddr超过 3 年前
Perhaps the most angering part is that both Google and Apple will greenwash the issue away as during product launches (which is where all attention is) where they will emphasize how very sustainable they are.<p>That&#x27;s the tactic to get away with piss poor aftercare. It&#x27;s time for regulation and I mean harsh regulation. A product should be supported for as long as the reasonable duration of its hardware life cycle.<p>I have 7 year old smartphones that still work just fine. So you&#x27;re going to be delivering support for a long time, even up to a decade.<p>Unwilling to do it or technical excuses? No problem. Refund the phone. I have a working paid device, you broke it. It&#x27;s not my problem that your security model is like Swiss cheese. It&#x27;s your defect, not mine.<p>Battery replacements are to be made dead simple as it always was before. This is actually a key reason why people needlessly buy a new phone.<p>All reasonable repairs should be possible to be carried out anywhere, including by the customer themself. You&#x27;re going to document the process and supply the components.<p>You may think of this as an angry extreme rant, but I&#x27;m serious. The point is that the pain should be put where it belongs. When you make a crappy product, the producer should feel it, not the consumer. This creates the incentive for the producer to create a product that doesn&#x27;t break down so easily. Likewise, producers are a much larger factor in sustainability compared to a consumer, so they should drive it.<p>Speaking of security, it&#x27;s laughable that in a digital society, we accept that everything requires forever frequent updates otherwise its insecure. What does that tell you about the foundation of our computing? It&#x27;s garbage. Yes, I know, &quot;programmers produce bugs&quot;, &quot;hackers are creative&quot;, but that&#x27;s an explanation, not an excuse.
_57jb超过 3 年前
How long though? This is the painful economics of technology.<p>I think a more pointed argument is the relationship the software, hardware, and consumer has in this.<p>As consumers we really can only vote with our purchasing and much of it is mired in learning by induction what we do&#x2F;don&#x27;t want.<p>The walled garden and immense control of iOS is great until it isn&#x27;t. The open landscape and diversity of Android is great until it isn&#x27;t.<p>The hardware manufacture and telecoms are an added pain in the mobile ecosystem. They want a hook into getting advertising in front of you so some of this hardware is subsidized through bloatware and system level apps that can&#x27;t be removed. I have an Amazon Prime app that I cannot uninstall (only hide) because it is a system app!?! Hardware manufacturing is a loss at the start of the sale and supporting it is an added cost.<p>The economics of the system are problematic and going to iOS will only work long enough until it doesn&#x27;t. Point I&#x27;m making is the problem is upstream.
Helmut10001超过 3 年前
I am still using my HTC HD2 from 2009 (running Windows Mobile 6.5) - meanwhile, since 2020, I do have two sim cards, because banking apps do not work on the HD2 and I have a spare Pixel 3a (always on wifi).<p>The HD2 SSL certificates stopped working about 7 years ago, but I set up an internal nginx proxy that downgrades SSL certificates for me, when at home. I find the RSS-Reader particularly good, because it does not show images, which often disctract from content. Also, the Garmin app works with offline maps, doesn&#x27;t expire and requires no subscription, and the HD2 is small - therefore quite good as a hiking companyon. It is on its 5th battery so far - this one lasts about a week on daily use, which is often more than new phones today. On the other hand, the Pixel 3a was the smallest phone I could get in 2020, and it is still too big to fit in my pockets.
cosmojg超过 3 年前
What? The Google Pixel line is one of the few smartphone lines continuously supported by every major open source mobile operating system.<p>CalyxOS: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;calyxos.org&#x2F;docs&#x2F;guide&#x2F;device-support&#x2F;#supported-devices-still-receiving-updates-from-the-manufacturer" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;calyxos.org&#x2F;docs&#x2F;guide&#x2F;device-support&#x2F;#supported-dev...</a><p>GrapheneOS: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;grapheneos.org&#x2F;faq#supported-devices" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;grapheneos.org&#x2F;faq#supported-devices</a><p>LineageOS: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wiki.lineageos.org&#x2F;devices&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;wiki.lineageos.org&#x2F;devices&#x2F;</a><p>All three are still delivering essential security updates for the Pixel 3. The author could have made a stronger argument by picking a different smartphone to complain about.
评论 #30083919 未加载
hawski超过 3 年前
You could buy Fairphone. What I do for now is to buy used phones with broken screen and replace it myself. I did it with Pixel 1 and now with Pixel 4a. It helps to keep costs down and I feel better about myself. Other than that I would go with Fairphone for their software support.
sdoering超过 3 年前
Call me an idiot, but for corporate work stuff I am still using my 2XL that hasn&#x27;t received updates in a long time.<p>As this is company provided hardware I actually just don&#x27;t care to switch to a Samsung (as the company only offers these if I do not want to pay additional money - and why would I for a company provided phone)<p>The phone still lasts longer than a day, I can use it to read my mails, see appointments, use slack, ms teams and use it as a 2nd factor to access corporate stuff.<p>It just works.<p>I don&#x27;t see me throwing it out if I am not forced by It because of security reasons (but I actually doubt they care as long as they can install corporate spyware on these devices).<p>Why would I trash the ressources that went into making of this thing, as long as it does what it should?
ChrisArchitect超过 3 年前
this is a long article about a weird flex. The device is still very much usable for majority daily usage and until hardware starts to go shouldn&#x27;t be tossed out or even feelings of pressure to ditch it. Weird. Have had old Nexuses, Moto Gs etc lying around in case something goes wrong with current device and they&#x27;re all still very usable even if the OS is a few versions back. Any regular apps still work and have their own security built in via SSL, passwords, 2FA, whatever, which is enough for the average user. Overreacting.<p>And as mentioned numerous times they&#x27;ve been slowly improving the commitment to longer device updates etc! The technology is more suited to it&#x2F;not as fast-moving as previous years.
MerelyMortal超过 3 年前
The author is dumping his Pixel 3 and seems to be very concerned about wasting hardware.<p>If only he knew about CalyxOS:<p>&gt; If you have a Pixel 3 or newer, you can install CalyxOS on your own device.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;calyxos.org" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;calyxos.org</a>
评论 #30074833 未加载
评论 #30074831 未加载
评论 #30074494 未加载
评论 #30074883 未加载
mips_avatar超过 3 年前
Say what you will about Microsoft, but Windows support is designed to last a long time.
评论 #30075407 未加载
cosmin800超过 3 年前
Of course google, and everybody else, wants us to throw away the phones and other products after 3 years, I don&#x27;t know if anyone noticed but USD 100K cars start to break a lot after 3 years (the usual warranty) so you have to buy extremely expensive replacement parts (10x price of the new one) and get dragged into a &quot;subscription&quot; or buy a new car. The planned obsolescence is real and everywhere, from cars to light bulbs, software, hardware, and now is even easier for them with internet connected devices, even if the device works they just pull the plug of the service and render it useless.
blacklight超过 3 年前
- LineageOS images are usually released for years after a phone&#x27;s official Android support is dropped. Just ditch your official Android image for LineageOS, and most people won&#x27;t even notice the difference.<p>- If you&#x27;re more brave and Linux-inclined, you may also opt for PostmarketOS.<p>- Next time, avoid buying hardware released by Google. Those guys are religiously following the Apple book when it comes to hardware: premium stuff with high profit margins, that gets deprecated within 3 years so they can just reiterate. If you buy Google products, you are funding planned obsolescence.
detcader超过 3 年前
Nothing will change until a large scale&#x2F;large target hack or until ecology activists can successfully get photos of huge piles of e-waste in front of people.<p>Needing to trash your phone every 5 years is still ridiculously wasteful. Just stop making so many new phones. Regulate it so it&#x27;s so illegal&#x2F;expensive that they can&#x27;t keep doing this. I can&#x27;t even stop using smartphones if I wanted to, because the people who came up with 2FA decided to make the Authenticator App a mandatory part of modern life, instead of physical security keys like they should have.
评论 #30076942 未加载
AtlasBarfed超过 3 年前
It&#x27;s too bad ubuntu&#x27;s and firefox&#x27;s UIs for phones died.<p>Maybe it is time for linux to stop obsessing over PCs and move to mobile.<p>But given how badly they continue to screw up desktop Linux with balkanization and failed support of settings and other things... well, maybe it&#x27;s an opportunity to do it right, but I doubt it.<p>But the need is there. You&#x27;d thing there would be a company to do this. Maybe now that hardware in phones is somewhat stabilized, a competing long term support OS company will appear.<p>It probably is a lot of grunt work and labor, so it won&#x27;t scale and SV won&#x27;t fund it.
rglullis超过 3 年前
In the spirit of recycling, let me repeat the remark I made on the thread about the problem of software subscriptions: <i>this is what you get for not supporting FOSS, especially its R&amp;D</i>.
评论 #30076660 未加载
sigmar超过 3 年前
&gt;Unless you routinely destroy your phone within two or three years, there’s no justification from a sustainability perspective to keep using Android phones. Of course, Apple is only good by comparison, as it also manufactures devices that are difficult to repair with an artificially short shelf life. It just happens to have a longer shelf life than Google.<p>Most of the iPhone users I see are using a phone they purchased within the past three years. Does the average iPhone get used for longer than the average Pixel?
评论 #30074641 未加载
评论 #30074971 未加载
评论 #30074912 未加载
评论 #30075144 未加载
评论 #30074705 未加载
评论 #30074737 未加载
arepublicadoceu超过 3 年前
People love to bash apple for their “expensive” products but I see it as I’m paying for support as well. My 3(?) years old iPhone XR works like new, receive regular updates and the battery still hold fine (never changed it).<p>Whereas my android phone before that never saw an update besides a couple odd security patches after a lot of delay.<p>I intend to use this iPhone until apple drop support for it. Maybe in a year or two I will replace the battery. But so far it’s the best phone purchase I ever made.
curiousgal超过 3 年前
I&#x27;m surprised no mentioned what an absolute shitshow Android 12 is. Getting &quot;stuck&quot; on Android 11 is a blessing. I regret updgrading from my Pixel 5 to the 6.
ebb_earl_co超过 3 年前
At first I thought that a good way out of this is to install Calyx OS or similar AOSP onto the Pixel, but then checked the Calyx support website [0] and, because they source the proprietary bits from Google, it&#x27;s the same problem as the post elaborates...<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;calyxos.org&#x2F;news&#x2F;2021&#x2F;05&#x2F;14&#x2F;security-updates&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;calyxos.org&#x2F;news&#x2F;2021&#x2F;05&#x2F;14&#x2F;security-updates&#x2F;</a>
lmilcin超过 3 年前
I am waiting for delivery of my new iPhone. I am switching from Pixel 2 XL which looks brand new and is fully functional and does everything I need. There is literally not a single thing that I miss in this phone other than newer OS and updates.<p>I have been delaying this decision for a year, but as a professional I can not continue using a phone that is not regularly updated. And so I will switch to a platform that will allow me to keep the device alive for much longer.
tombert超过 3 年前
For all the crap that Apple gets, I gave a friend my old iPhone XS Max purchased in December of 2018 that still gets updates, and doesn&#x27;t seem to have any EOL warnings. Since the hardware doesn&#x27;t appear to be showing any wear, I think there&#x27;s a reasonable chance my friend will get two more years out of this phone.<p>I think 5-6 years is a fairly reasonable amount of time for nearly any computer, let alone something that lives in my pocket.
hogrider超过 3 年前
I&#x27;ve dealt with this my whole life, I&#x27;m just on my second smarthpone ever since I try ro use it for as long as possible. I know not having security updates is bad on paper but what is the real risk? I guess I can study what vulns each update patches but I can&#x27;t imagine it&#x27;s stuff I have to worry about when I&#x27;m just making basic use of it, not sideloading app or rooting my phone or anything.
4k1l超过 3 年前
I have also the same issue now with my Samsung Galaxy note 10 plus. This device has insane specs (12 GB of RAM, really good camera and display, the battery still last over 1,5 days, and could still be usable in the next 3 years. I would though need to replace it next year, only because of the lack of security patches.<p>This is really crazy, when i think that i am still getting updates on a 7 years old laptop (both windows and linux).
ClumsyPilot超过 3 年前
If it has software, it&#x27;s not your property, and since software is everywhere, your right to private property is gone.<p>You can&#x27;t eacape this, now even batteries refuse to work without a software update.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;internetofshit&#x2F;status&#x2F;1484961343916494852?t=p4Q-W0zYu9se7sd5rWt3ow&amp;s=19" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;internetofshit&#x2F;status&#x2F;148496134391649485...</a>
评论 #30074753 未加载
istillwritecode超过 3 年前
This is basically why I treat my phone as an untrusted device. The rest of the world wants me to use my phone as an extension of myself, but I treat it only as a portal to the public world. Security updates are almost irrelevant if there is nothing too sensitive on the phone. In particular, I don&#x27;t have my gmail account on my phone, and I don&#x27;t have access to monetary information on my phone.
mfer超过 3 年前
&gt; In 2021, an estimated of 57.4 Mt of E-waste was generated globally [1]<p>This is an increase over 2019 and before. The way things are designed and companies drive for profits on electronic things leads to more and more e-waste.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Electronic_waste#E-waste_data_2021" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Electronic_waste#E-waste_data_...</a>
spoonjim超过 3 年前
There should be a federal law of a tax for non-user-serviceable batteries and a requirement to support devices with security updates for 20 years.
评论 #30075165 未加载
secondcoming超过 3 年前
I was eventually forced to upgrade my iPad because the YouTube app stopped working due to a required update that was unavailable for my device. Several others such as banking apps stopped working before that.<p>Before that I had to ditch my otherwise perfectly fine OnePlus phone for similar reasons. I went with a Nokia because they promised several years of Android updates, so we&#x27;ll see how that pans out.<p>Quite annoying.
评论 #30074997 未加载
评论 #30074598 未加载
评论 #30074736 未加载
Markoff超过 3 年前
Someone stops the guy from installing unofficial ROM especially in Pixel phone with easily unlockable bootloader?<p>Let&#x27;s ignore the fact the phone is perfectly fine even without latest security patch even without unofficial ROM. How exactly would someone exploit his phone if he is using newest versions of secured apps? The odds of attack on his phone are next to zero.
wanderingmind超过 3 年前
I&#x27;m amazed that Lineage OS still supports Pixel 1 while Google can&#x27;t provide support and updates for Pixel 3. Google just doesn&#x27;t care about long term support which makes business sense since most people want to upgrade phones in 2-3 years. However it is completely antithetical to themselves calling an environmentally responsible company.
throwaway22032超过 3 年前
I get that I&#x27;m not the target market here, but the headline is quite amusing.<p>I bought a Pixel 3 specifically _because_ it had support in Lineage and I could whack microG on it.<p>I have some &gt;8 year old tablets running Lineage and variants.<p>I do wish though that Google would just IBM PC the ecosystem though. It&#x27;d make 1% less money or whatever, so it ain&#x27;t ever happening.
SakiToki超过 3 年前
I would agree also as 3a user. The phone has been my favorite for a long time and its usage is pretty sweet for the price point. But the overall lack of support that google is showing for its old devices is saddening and has kinda put the nail in the coffin for getting a iphone and rolling with it at such a high price point.
mynameisash超过 3 年前
Not that having another big player would <i>solve</i> the problem, but I do wish we at least had Microsoft still in the game as a foil against Google and Apple.<p>In lieu of that, it&#x27;s still on my very long to-do list to figure out how to flash my Android phone to finish extricating myself from the Google ecosystem. One of these days...
Terry_Roll超过 3 年前
People are ditching their smart phones it seems <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bbc.co.uk&#x2F;news&#x2F;business-60067032" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bbc.co.uk&#x2F;news&#x2F;business-60067032</a><p>Havent had a phone for years now, too much hacking and surveillance for my liking, glad to not be drinking the Kool-Aid.
pabs3超过 3 年前
For Linux based devices (including Android devices), a lot of the problem is lack of support for the device in Linux mainline. Devices that are supported in Linux mainline generally get updates pretty much forever (think your laptop). Of course, getting mainline support is a lot of work that is costly.
pabs3超过 3 年前
A related post I read recently:<p>&quot;Musings on long-term software support and economic incentives&quot; <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;veronneau.org&#x2F;musings-on-long-term-software-support-and-economic-incentives.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;veronneau.org&#x2F;musings-on-long-term-software-support-...</a>
Melatonic超过 3 年前
Just because a device stops receiving security updates does not automatically mean its instantly unsafe to use. Unless you are a high profile target or a serious exploit comes out you can probably safely still use that device for quite awhile. If you want to be confident in your security then that might require some extra steps on your part monitoring what exploits are being released but with a hugely popular device like the Pixel I doubt that is very difficult. Tons of people are going to be using them regardless without any thought to security.<p>That being said this whole 3 years of security updates is of course totally stupid and we deserve more. And manufacturers look to be realizing this. But if the rest of the phone hardware wise is also on a similar obsolescence cycle then is software updates the real problem here?<p>Our devices are becoming more and more disposable in many ways and we need to target the root of the problem - if you can easily replace your battery and your 5 year old phone still does everything you need then there will be much more consumer demand in turn for longer software update support.
PraetorianGourd超过 3 年前
Apple are bastards because they lock out users from modifying hardware. Google are bastards for not supporting older hardware. Microsoft were bastards for not having apps. There was the opportunity for a triopoly but snapchat was, depressingly, more important at the time.
johnmarcus超过 3 年前
I keep my old phones as backup for either myself, or that poor soul you come across whom just smashed their screen and do not have money for a new one.<p>Or sometimes I just keep it in my car as a an emergency phone &#x2F; for pandora &#x2F; for maps. It almost never goes to waste that way.
trwhite超过 3 年前
Unrelated, but I think the latest Android update is ghastly and I have no way of changing back to how it looked before. I&#x27;m all for progressive design but some of the new UI changes (for example the clock app which I use every day) make it way less usable for me.
throwawayboise超过 3 年前
I buy cheap (but not bottom-tier) Android phones. I&#x27;ve been happy with Motorola phones. If they stop getting updates after a few years, I can replace them without feeling like I&#x27;m scrapping a phone that I paid a lot of money for.<p>Pixel phones are way out of my price range.
mschuster91超过 3 年前
Not to mention that if you root them or install a custom firmware to keep using your device, most banking apps, Netflix and any games will simply refuse to run or weirdly crash (e.g. the Nintendo Switch companion app - which is a <i>voicechat</i> ffs).
acd超过 3 年前
One could load Cyanogenmod or a Linux based phone. Old electronics is a reason we must by law requiere manufacturers to have open devices. A phone should function like a personal computer. Open boot loader, standard boot process, standard chassi.
kazinator超过 3 年前
&gt; <i>I think of phones in much the same way I think of refrigerators or stoves.</i><p>Is that so?<p>I&#x27;ve never heard anyone complain about their fridge not receiving security updates any more, making it dangerous to use.<p>(Though the Internet of Idiotic Things wants to change that, of course.)
postalrat超过 3 年前
How about expecting at least 1 year of service for every $150 in the price of the phone.
Digit-Al超过 3 年前
I&#x27;m still using my Google Nexus 6P that I purchased five and a half years ago. Yes, it hasn&#x27;t been updated for years but I almost never download new apps to it and I haven&#x27;t been compromised so far (as far as I am aware).
markstos超过 3 年前
I was a Pixel 3 phone owner and switched to an iPhone after using Android since I bought my first smartphone over 10 years ago. The author nailed it: Google&#x27;s lack of ongoing software support for their hardware is a problem.
pshirshov超过 3 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;calyxos.org&#x2F;news&#x2F;2022&#x2F;01&#x2F;19&#x2F;android-12-changelog&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;calyxos.org&#x2F;news&#x2F;2022&#x2F;01&#x2F;19&#x2F;android-12-changelog&#x2F;</a>
julienfr112超过 3 年前
On thing where google &#x2F; android &#x2F; pixel really shine is for google workspace integration and work profile. I do BYOD, and I ve got a work profile, with segregated apps and content. You have no equivalent with iphone.
jl6超过 3 年前
Truly we have built our house on sand when devices depend on a steady stream of security updates to remain safe. We are in the bleak dark ages of computing where the idea of shipping bug-free code is laughed off as a fantasy.
WYepQ4dNnG超过 3 年前
Mega corps marketing themselves as carbon neutral, but in reality they don&#x27;t give two fck about the environment. If they did, they will try to support these devices avoiding people to dump them to jump on a new one.
froggertoaster超过 3 年前
Perhaps one of the strongest arguments for owning Apple tech is that <i>they support their devices for long after everyone else would stop doing so</i>.<p>Android has classically been a dumpster fire compared to Apple on this front.
sgt101超过 3 年前
The really odd thing is that my daughters 3XL just died - it was under guarantee so I returned it and they gave me a new one. It&#x27;s got a years guarantee to go! Can I return it because there are no updates?
olliej超过 3 年前
Wait so the actual <i>google flagship</i> only gets three years of support?
lambic超过 3 年前
It&#x27;s not an ideal solution, but when I have to get a new phone the old one becomes my tv remote. I&#x27;m not too worried about security updates on a device that just has netflix and kodi on it.
jdlyga超过 3 年前
If your device is no longer able to get updates, and there is no viable alternative OS that you can run, it is no longer perfectly good. Perfectly good for electronics recycling perhaps.
kombine超过 3 年前
Thanks to this article I learned that my perfectly functioning OnePlus 6T received its last update in November, 2021. I think enough is enough and I will switch to Apple as soon as I can
formvoltron超过 3 年前
It&#x27;s a good point. If you work at Google, just know that I&#x27;ll be doing the same. If Google refuses updates for perfectly good hardware, then I&#x27;ll move to the iPhone.
IMAYousaf超过 3 年前
Are there any rumblings of Google making its own chips? I figured it wouldn&#x27;t be that big of an organizational leap considering they already produce their own TPU&#x27;s.
MisterBastahrd超过 3 年前
I have had a 2XL, 4XL, and now a 5a... and the 5a looks nice but is actually a piece of crap. I can&#x27;t recall EVER having a phone with this many network hiccups.
uhtred超过 3 年前
Just install an alternative android OS on the phone and it will last you longer. Pretty sure Graphene supports the pixel 3. Probably Calyx. Probably &#x2F;e&#x2F;OS.
bocytron超过 3 年前
You don&#x27;t have to switch to iPhone, why not switch to the Fairphone instead, which principles and ethics are exactly the one the author is looking for?
Snuupy超过 3 年前
One possible solution is to flash a custom ROM.
评论 #30075055 未加载
评论 #30074474 未加载
评论 #30074528 未加载
评论 #30075570 未加载
OOPMan超过 3 年前
Isn&#x27;t the Pixel fairly well supported in terms of custom ROMs which in turn unlock access to more recent security updates?
8bitsrule超过 3 年前
&gt; So here I am, with another piece of premature junk, made by the company that pledges to “maximize the reuse of finite resources” and “enable others to do the same.”<p>Some pledges are cheaper than others. Bottom-feeding pledges (whether well-intended or malicious) do not detail the steps that will be taken to implement them. As such they live in the misty realms of wishitude, along with campaign promises, and depend on trusting customers to imagine a positive outcome.
marcodiego超过 3 年前
No no! If you can&#x27;t control the software your device runs, you can&#x27;t consider it &quot;perfectly good&quot;.
pipeline_peak超过 3 年前
“Forcing” is melodramatic, they dropped support. They aren’t directly advising you to stop using your device or else.
fernowens超过 3 年前
After all, it&#x27;s just business for them. This is why I also transferred to iPhones because of this one.
a-dub超过 3 年前
even worse, verizon won&#x27;t unlock the bootloaders on the now unsupported phones so you can&#x27;t even install a third party supported rom.<p>also, i don&#x27;t care how much fawning comes out of the press... the pixel 6 is an enormous impractical behemoth that barely fits in half my pockets.
shadowgovt超过 3 年前
Is the Pixel 3 outside the standard window for EOL, or is a 3-year lifecycle par for the course?
ballenf超过 3 年前
Regulation to require jailbreaking any device that reaches EOL or support would be welcome.
评论 #30076017 未加载
mediumsmart超过 3 年前
I tried to read the article but it does not have a perfectly good cookie reject button.
causi超过 3 年前
What else is new? AT&amp;T recently forced me to dump my perfectly good OnePlus 6.
unknown2374超过 3 年前
surprised to see no mention of CalyxOS [0], which is still pushing security updates to their oldest supported phone, the Pixel 2.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;calyxos.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;calyxos.org&#x2F;</a>
rPlayer6554超过 3 年前
I own a pixel 3 in good working condition.....do I really need to get a new one?
danielktdoranie超过 3 年前
Yeah but Apple is the bad guy. Yet, my iPhone from 2016 runs the latest iOS.
happytiger超过 3 年前
Well I used to have nest smoke detectors. My recent call to ask why all of my nests have stopped working came with a “oh well, your on firmware v1 and we aren’t releasing for that device anymore.” So I have a thousand bucks worth of smoke detectors going in the trash. The box said 7 years, but the firmware updates ended after 6, so recycling here we go. But the thing HN needs to understand is that the way google enforced expiring was to make the smoke detectors, one after the other, start chirping at high volume, often in the middle of the night, and with no warning in the app. So even if a corporation deciding that I have to replace all my smoke detectors after 7 years is reasonable, understand that the devices are worse than bricked — they are literally beeping to be replaced and there is no way to stop the behavior. We ended up with a stack of them on a counter trying to figure out what was going on, as one after the other hit their manufacturing date and expired in the same way. It was strangely dystopian. Like the company has spoken and you peons must upgrade.<p>My favorite call was after I put in the next thermostat and had a $1500 bill. Apparently if your kids come home from school and it’s hot, they crank the AC down but being young they just turn the dial all the way. We learned of it after a particularly hot period (the kids would apparently always adjust it up again before we got home from work). This the system “learned” to make it arctic cold at 3:25 every day and stop doing so before 6. A well time vacation later, and our utility company was sending us quickly to the bill (it was regularly less than 300). Google support said, “yea, we hear about problems like that all the time,” and told us, “my suggestion would be to turn off the learning feature of your thermostat and just use it as a regular thermostat.” Ok. Will do. But wow, to find out it wasn’t an unusual use case was mind blowing.<p>I stopped using Google for devices some time back because of firmware issues with support on phones. I realized after we have a series of iPhones hit 5 years or even six years old that I found them, batteries barely holding a charge but still working, charging for use above a drawer filled with my old android devices which were collecting dust, but were years younger, that the value isn’t there. Our form of response to the current fast fashion electronics industry to to use our devices as long as possible. Apple is a better value in that respect, despite their outright hostility to independent repair — which definitely dents their reputation in our house — so we ended up standardizing on their technology. Common sense environmentalism is making sure you minimize how much you buy.<p>It’s interesting how much the longevity of devices (and privacy concerns) are becoming the major criteria for which devices we allow into our lives these days. Google has failed us repeatedly and lost our trust and we probably won’t ever buy another device from them. There was a time when I loved and adored them. Their growth seems to have lost what made them special in their DNA (transforming towns with savior Internet service, connecting the Worlds information &gt; explaining yet another ocean of ad fraud, sunsetting every product we liked, afore mentioned firmware bugs) and we kind of look at them as the company we used to love. Honestly makes me sad. It was at one point one of the best hacker groups on the planet, insanely innovative, and run like one.<p>I hope durability and reliability becomes a major tech trend.
FirstLvR超过 3 年前
ahem, this is the main reason i ditch android for iphone a few years ago... Apple devices keep on running years after they supossed to<p>is design flaw from the industry, top brands should do better
dataexporter超过 3 年前
Its not just Google. All the network providers in America are pushing forced consumption down consumer throats by giving a deadline for upgrading their phones - beyond which it would stop working.<p>I have two perfectly working (though a little older) phones - OnePlus 3 and a Galaxy S6 Edge. From February both these phones will not work with my phone carrier. I am aware that these are older phones and don&#x27;t receive security patches etc, however I was perfectly fine using them and didn&#x27;t have any issues with it. Too concerned about the consumerist lifestyle that is forced by this capitalist economy instead of providing updates&#x2F;upgrades to their user till the phone&#x27;s full life.
toss1超过 3 年前
Same for Google&#x2F;Android and Samsung. My perfectly fine working and unblemished like-new Galaxy S8 is now off of regular updates, and behind a couple versions of the OS.<p>So, it and I are basically running on borrowed time until a vulnerability strikes.<p>It should definitely be mandatory to provide support any device over a certain level of cost and total sales for at least 7 years. Sure, people hate regulations and mandates, but otherwise we&#x27;re stuck because a herd of sociopathic managers would rather pad their bonus pool then do the right thing, which is entirely within every company&#x27;s budget, from Qualcom right through Smasung and Google.
NoblePublius超过 3 年前
A new Moto G Pure is $140. You’re gonna be fine.
Im_your_dada超过 3 年前
Apple does the same thing with phones and macs.
pavelevst超过 3 年前
iPhone 6 still get security updates sometimes, just can’t be used with latest iOS
farzher超过 3 年前
ok boomer. maybe ask your kid to install a custom rom for you since you can&#x27;t figure it out
iqanq超过 3 年前
This is what happens when you don&#x27;t buy an iPhone.
nix23超过 3 年前
Here you vice crybabys:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;download.lineageos.org&#x2F;blueline" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;download.lineageos.org&#x2F;blueline</a>
oxymoran超过 3 年前
It was always a security risk because google has always been spying on you…nobody is forcing you to buy android phones.
评论 #30074742 未加载
评论 #30075022 未加载