TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The sun was dimmer when earth formed – how did life emerge?

68 点作者 sdht0超过 3 年前

8 条评论

beefman超过 3 年前
Neither this article nor the wikipedia entry[1] contain the string &quot;geothermal&quot;. A web search[2] seems to return some stuff. Both sources of geothermal heat (residual heat from the planet&#x27;s formation and nuclear decay heat) were greater in the distant past, to my understanding...<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Faint_young_Sun_paradox" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Faint_young_Sun_paradox</a><p>[2] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.google.com&#x2F;search?q=faint%20young%20sun%20geothermal&amp;safe=off" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.google.com&#x2F;search?q=faint%20young%20sun%20geothe...</a>
评论 #30120710 未加载
评论 #30120494 未加载
Zenst超过 3 年前
Equally the earths core and mantel being closer to it&#x27;s formation, would of been hotter. So heat levels would of been offset perhaps by that aspect. Then the atmosphere would of been different.<p>Those are two area&#x27;s that I&#x27;d like to see data upon.<p>After all, the Earth was a molten ball that slowly cools and you can&#x27;t overlook that nuance over time. Which may of well balanced out the suns output levels for surface temperatures. Certainly volcanic activities and techonomic plate activities were far more active in the early days of Earth.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Earth%27s_crustal_evolution" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Earth%27s_crustal_evolution</a> seems a good read in conjunction with this article.
评论 #30120729 未加载
评论 #30120225 未加载
评论 #30121703 未加载
kubafu超过 3 年前
The article doesn&#x27;t mention it, but is it possible the Earth was slightly closer to the Sun when the solar system formed? I&#x27;d say assuming it was always at 150m km is doubtful.
评论 #30119978 未加载
grishka超过 3 年前
All these theories assume that life emerged on Earth, from scratch. But what if it didn&#x27;t? What if it got here in a meteorite for example and then started evolving because of a favorable environment? Some bacteria are capable of surviving extreme conditions, so that&#x27;s a possibility. And, there were cases when meteorites contained some of molecules (I don&#x27;t remember which exact ones) that are basic building blocks of life as we know it.
评论 #30122972 未加载
_dain_超过 3 年前
The Earth had a faster rotation speed so its thermal equilibrium average temperature was higher (compared to if it spun like it does today). Look at the quartic term in the Stefan Boltzmann law and think about how that interacts with the Jensen inequality.
aledalgrande超过 3 年前
&gt; We know that life under our faint young sun was possible, and now we might know why. What we are starting to see is just how lucky we may have been in avoiding becoming a permanent snowball Earth or even a steam Earth. Somehow, conditions were just right on our planet, keeping us in this narrow window between being frozen solid and evaporating to oblivion, and allowing us to survive — despite a few near misses. “There’s a huge discussion about the requirements for habitability,” said Feulner. “Even on Earth, things could have gone wrong easily.”
WalterBright超过 3 年前
On the other hand, why hasn&#x27;t life colonized the arctic?<p>(Yes, I know about penguins and polar bears. I would expect more than that.)<p>Also at higher altitudes.
评论 #30122598 未加载
selimthegrim超过 3 年前
I wonder if Heller’s solution mentioned in the article also tackles the lunar inclination problem.