TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Chinese Corporate Transparency Is Far Better Than America’s

6 点作者 radmuzom超过 3 年前

1 comment

yorwba超过 3 年前
I was expecting a typical country comparison article, where a country&#x27;s policies are misrepresented to an unsuspecting audience in order to push the author&#x27;s favorite policy proposal, but I was pleasantly surprised by this one.<p>I&#x27;ve used Qichacha <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;qcc.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;qcc.com&#x2F;</a> in the past to look up various Chinese companies and it was really quite surprising how easy they made it to access all kinds of information. On the other hand, they&#x27;re trying harder and harder to monetize their service by putting information behind login walls etc.<p>It&#x27;s also interesting that OpenCorporates (mentioned in the article) doesn&#x27;t seem to have any data on Chinese companies at all. Searching for 公司 <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;opencorporates.com&#x2F;companies?q=%E5%85%AC%E5%8F%B8&amp;utf8=%E2%9C%93" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;opencorporates.com&#x2F;companies?q=%E5%85%AC%E5%8F%B8&amp;ut...</a> turns up more than 2 million companies in Hong Kong, 792 in Japan, 5 in New Zealand, and one each in Belgium and Vietnam, and that&#x27;s it. Maybe they missed the window of opportunity before NECIPS started requiring account registration and they don&#x27;t want to use third party aggregators?