TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Is Android really free software? - Richard Stallman

27 点作者 Anilm3超过 13 年前

2 条评论

ZeroGravitas超过 13 年前
<i>Google has said it will never publish the source code of Android 3.0 (aside from Linux), even though executables have been released to the public. Android 3.1 source code is also being withheld. Thus, Android 3, apart from Linux, is non-free software, pure and simple.</i><p>I was under the impression that this wouldn't be possible due to their use of git, and so while they aren't making a big deal of it, you could, if you so desired figure out at which point they branched for 3.0 or 3.x and create your own version, they're just not going to make it easy because they'd rather you use the newer code built on top of that.<p>I assumed he was going to say it's not free software because they've not yet released the code above the linux level. If he's saying that it's <i>only</i> not considered free software by him because it will <i>never</i> be released, then I'd be interested in what he'd think if it's simply delayed and semi-obfuscated as part of a later version release.<p>Also, is Replicant targetting the Galaxy S II? I thought I read that it had the best support for the hardware without binary of proprietary chunks, but I don't see any mention of it on their site.
评论 #3017680 未加载
j_col超过 13 年前
From the article:<p>&#62; Thus, Android 3, apart from Linux, is non-free software, pure and simple.<p>Couldn't agree more, happy to see Stallman call it: Android 3.x is clearly <i>not</i> open source.
评论 #3017682 未加载