TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Apple's privacy push cost Meta $10B

489 点作者 robteix超过 3 年前

40 条评论

samwillis超过 3 年前
As a rough datapoint, I run a consumer targeted e-commerce site. We ran a campaign before Christmas were we were selling a new product that was only marketed on Facebook, we are certain that (almost) all customers found it though that Facebook campaign. Facebook was only able to <i>attribute about 50% of the sales</i> to the ads, it should have been close to 100%. This then meant that Facebooks estimated CPA was effectively double what it actually was.<p>Important to note about 60% of our customers are on an iOS device, which is a little higher than the global average but matches the market segment we are in in the UK.<p>The situation improved after about 4 weeks, I believe Facebook now uses some &quot;AI&quot; to help with attribution on iOS, but it&#x27;s somewhat difficult to be sure as by then we had other campaigns running.<p>So, this will definitely be effecting marketers decision making process of where to allocate spend. It certainly made us more courteous about spending on Facebook.
评论 #30205816 未加载
评论 #30205606 未加载
评论 #30205361 未加载
评论 #30205508 未加载
评论 #30206240 未加载
评论 #30215279 未加载
评论 #30218868 未加载
评论 #30211155 未加载
评论 #30212377 未加载
评论 #30212444 未加载
评论 #30209997 未加载
erikpukinskis超过 3 年前
I remember when Facebook Platform came out. The super early version where you could embed your app on Facebook and engage with the social graph.<p>I thought dang, this is smart. They’ll basically own the next level up the stack from the browser: they’ll own the “social chrome” of every application on the web.<p>Although it devolved into spam, Facebook was a hot spot of weird social games for a while there. And every web dev was learning how to build Facebook apps. We wondered if we’d even really need a domain for much more than a landing page, if 99% of our engagement was going to come through Facebooks.<p>And then they killed it because they wanted to own the entire experience inside Facebook. It became not a walled garden, but a walled flower pot.<p>It always seemed short sighted to me. Yes, they lost control allowing third party apps in their frame. But didn’t they want to be a Microsoft and not a WordPerfect?<p>Looking back, I wonder if it was a missed opportunity. They have to go try to be the metaverse because social never became a platform.
评论 #30213210 未加载
评论 #30207990 未加载
评论 #30207887 未加载
d12bb超过 3 年前
Nice how Zuck said $10bn in the analysts call with nothing to back it up, but the whole press jumps on it. Apple is not Facebook&#x27;s problem, all they did was giving users a choice, which should have happened ages ago. So Facebook just says Apple kills our business without ever thinking that maybe users don&#x27;t like the way they do business. If they did, they wouldn&#x27;t opt out…
评论 #30205905 未加载
评论 #30208529 未加载
alanlammiman超过 3 年前
The problem isn&#x27;t just Apple&#x27;s action on IDFA. It&#x27;s that Facebook seems to be so poorly managed on some fronts that its reactions, rather than mitigating problems, has caused further harm. For example - in a rushed effort to get their privacy issues in order, they are deactivating the live facebook integrations of customers based on cursory&#x2F;mistaken&#x2F;possibly machine-based readings of their privacy policies.<p>They did that to us yesterday: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;shared-crater-f3a.notion.site&#x2F;Facebook-is-Breaking-Apps-in-Production-while-Running-Ads-for-them-19ef0d87d97b4f739b1ba2c2ee0af7dd" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;shared-crater-f3a.notion.site&#x2F;Facebook-is-Breaking-A...</a><p>We spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on facebook app ads per month. We can deal with IDFA giving way to more aggregated attribution (we don&#x27;t want to track individuals - we just want to measure if the ads we paid for led to sales). But facebook breaking our app in production because they can&#x27;t be bothered doing their job properly is very serious. It can&#x27;t be solved by reducing ad spend, only by removing their SDK from our app.<p>If this is also happening to many other developers right now, that, more than the Q4 results or the IDFA issue itself, could be causing the drop in the share price.<p>In fact, if you look at the Q4 results, the earnings miss was more because of growth in G&amp;A (which grew by 3 percentage-points of revenue if I&#x27;m not mistaken) than because of a top-line slowdown. And if you read the comments as to what made G&amp;A grow, it&#x27;s &#x27;legal costs&#x27;.
评论 #30211014 未加载
评论 #30209280 未加载
isodev超过 3 年前
All Apple did was give users the choice. Users choosing to deny Facebook the permission to share their data? That&#x27;s entirely on Facebook.
评论 #30206753 未加载
评论 #30213722 未加载
hollowdene超过 3 年前
There&#x27;s a whole ecosystem of businesses that rely on Facebook that are going to start hurting a lot over the next few years.<p>I used to work at a publisher where 80% of their website traffic came from Facebook. They haven&#x27;t seen audience growth in years and their audience is skewing older and older, which is bad for their advertising business<p>Businesses like that are going to get steadily squeezed both by Facebook&#x27;s declining audience share and Facebook&#x27;s own efforts to change what people see.
评论 #30205537 未加载
评论 #30205519 未加载
评论 #30205730 未加载
评论 #30205579 未加载
评论 #30213955 未加载
评论 #30208515 未加载
评论 #30210311 未加载
评论 #30205551 未加载
tromp超过 3 年前
&gt; But last year, citing privacy concerns, Apple turned off IDFA by default and forced apps to ask people if they want to be tracked. It seems most do not: a study in December by AppsFlyer, an ad-tech company, suggested that 54% of Apple users who saw the prompt opted out.<p>Hard to believe that nearly half of all people is ok with being tracked...
评论 #30205376 未加载
评论 #30205312 未加载
评论 #30205274 未加载
评论 #30210335 未加载
评论 #30206415 未加载
paxys超过 3 年前
Snap is still somehow up 50% today. Google is similarly doing great. The problem is more on Facebook&#x27;s end than Apple&#x27;s. TikTok did way more damage than Apple ever could.
评论 #30212988 未加载
评论 #30215522 未加载
评论 #30211184 未加载
评论 #30211612 未加载
skizm超过 3 年前
Facebook&#x27;s revenue up 35% year over year: -26% (P&#x2F;E ~16)<p>Amazon&#x27;s revenue up 15% year over year: +12% (P&#x2F;E 60+)<p>I don&#x27;t get the stock market. Facebook can simply turn on billions in revenue whenever they want still with WhatsApp, which has north of 2 billion MAU, and has not been monetized at all yet. Facebook is a reverse meme stock.
评论 #30213321 未加载
评论 #30211866 未加载
评论 #30208154 未加载
评论 #30208377 未加载
评论 #30213039 未加载
mojuba超过 3 年前
I&#x27;m going to ask the same question here:<p>If I run a Facebook ad campaign for my app and given that Apple already provides the SKAdNetwork attribution mechanism, does enabling IDFA benefit my app, or it benefits only Facebook? Marketing people are trying to convince me IDFA is important for ad efficiency and thus should be enabled (with the spooky ATT popup in the beginning), but something is telling me it&#x27;s not. I might be wrong and would really like to know.
评论 #30206386 未加载
mojuba超过 3 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.fo&#x2F;ZasjX" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.fo&#x2F;ZasjX</a>
sjs382超过 3 年前
Alternatively, &quot;How Apple Closed the Privacy Hole that Facebook Was Exploiting to the Tune of $10bn&quot;
scim-knox-twox超过 3 年前
&gt; For years, Apple helped by offering an “identifier for advertisers” (IDFA), giving advertisers a way to track people’s behaviour on its devices. (...) But last year, citing privacy concerns, Apple turned off IDFA by default and forced apps to ask people if they want to be tracked.<p>And everyone praised Apple for it. But if Apple really care about privacy, they&#x27;d never allowed for IDFA in the first place…<p>&gt; Google will soon offer most users of Android, its mobile operating system, the ability to opt out of ad tracking.<p>I&#x27;ll believe it when they pass some independent audits from EU countries xD
评论 #30207875 未加载
评论 #30207927 未加载
zahma超过 3 年前
Apple knows where the future of technology is going, and Meta is getting in the way. Meta, appropriately renamed to reflect the trend toward augmented and virtual reality, would eventually become a threat to Apple’s walled garden business model. Apple gives lip service to privacy so long as it attracts users to their platform. However the moment we’re in is when the their invasion of privacy is meant to benefit their vision for keeping a customer totally content from home, to work, to play; they have a service for everything, and the data with which they have determined hidden markets, pain points, and markets of desire is coming at a cost for Facebook&#x2F;Meta.<p>In the future, whether that’s 5, 10, or 20 years, the biggest companies will produce their own platforms of walled garden experiences. Meta isn’t there yet and has suffered a setback, but the reports that Meta is trying to poach Apple devs is telling about where this is all headed. The “metaverse” is nascent and mockable, but my kid will probably grow up in it just like I grew up on AIM, chat rooms, and texting.
评论 #30208027 未加载
intrasight超过 3 年前
FB is one of the most developer hostile platforms that I&#x27;ve worked with. For example, their API tokens expire in 60 days, so users of automated reporting tools are constantly having to re-grant. Why? No good reason. And the documentation is garbage. FB can&#x27;t blame Apple or anyone else for those failings. They should fix the things that are under their own control.
评论 #30214949 未加载
评论 #30214559 未加载
1024core超过 3 年前
Archive link: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;cyxRR" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.ph&#x2F;cyxRR</a>
yalogin超过 3 年前
I haven&#x27;t followed the whole apple privacy push and how it impacted advertising. However, isn&#x27;t everyone always logged into Facebook? If so they already know who is using it and any interaction will tell them exactly who used it. How does the Apple&#x27;s platform level change effect them? Am I missing something?
评论 #30208487 未加载
评论 #30208520 未加载
EGreg超过 3 年前
I think their Metaverse push was actually a great way for rats to escape a sinking ship ... by finding a new ship!<p>Facebook just could never really capture the whole &quot;facilitating real world interactions&quot; thing, and for most people it became simply a way to maintain an online avatar &#x2F; identity, argue about politics, comment on cat memes, and otherwise waste time in cyberspace. That&#x27;s what they&#x27;re good at, and maybe with the metaverse they can at least make people more productive with that.<p>Now there are BENEFITS to MetaVerse. Less usage of fossil fuels. Facebook also facilitated conversations between people around the world, that would otherwise not meet. But its centralized nature and limited flexibility held back the whole space.<p>But when it comes to making plans in real life, forming relationships, deal flow etc. you need open source software like this: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=pZ1O_gmPneI" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=pZ1O_gmPneI</a>
annoyingnoob超过 3 年前
If you were to physically track someone and catalog everything they do in meatspace, we&#x27;d call that stalking. Why is that behavior acceptable when done by software? It should not be okay, its still stalking - no matter your intentions or end goals.
btdmaster超过 3 年前
This &quot;privacy push&quot; is only a change with respect to IDFA -- something specifically built by Apple to compete with Google&#x27;s advertising ID. Opting out system-wide was already possible, but unsurprisingly its existence is not something that&#x27;s well-known since Apple has established themselves as Goddess of Privacy: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Identifier_for_Advertisers" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Identifier_for_Advertisers</a>.<p>To me, this is closer to &quot;Apple spying technology becomes opt-in and no one uses it anymore&quot;.
asiachick超过 3 年前
I find it sad that Google&#x27;s response to privacy is FLoC &#x2F; Topics API instead of just embracing privacy like Apple. I know Google is an ad company. Still, they mostly control both Android and Chrome which means if they followed Apple&#x27;s example on privacy they wouldn&#x27;t be losing much of competitive advantage because if both Android and Chrome were privacy oriented that means there&#x27;d be no OS where some competitor could track. In other words, it still seems like they&#x27;d be #1 if they switched to content based ads and context (search) but zero tracking.
darthrupert超过 3 年前
If you think that manipulating people is evil, then ads are evil and hence Meta and Alphabet are evil.<p>If you think that some manipulation is evil, then it&#x27;s about how they manipulate and on which issues. Perhaps manipulating people to buy something is ok but manipulating them to harm the society (something which Meta is clearly guilty of) is not. Then these companies could turn good if they just turned down a lot of their profit. Which of course won&#x27;t happen because as companies their prime directive is to make money.<p>If you think that all manipulation is ok then your opinion should be dismissed.
评论 #30230611 未加载
citizenpaul超过 3 年前
Its 100% because FB&#x2F;meta is a growth stock and they lost users. This made all the finance projections break and institutions had th liquidate based on their new projections. That is how finance works at scale.
honkycat超过 3 年前
There was a great tweet today: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mobile.twitter.com&#x2F;kevinroose&#x2F;status&#x2F;1489274079685136385" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;mobile.twitter.com&#x2F;kevinroose&#x2F;status&#x2F;148927407968513...</a><p>Kevin Roose: Can&#x27;t imagine why this platform is shrinking<p>Facebook top ten: The top-performing link posts by U.S. Facebook pages in the last 24 hours are from:<p>1. Breitbart 2. Ben Shapiro 3. Dan Bongino 4. NPR 5. Ben Shapiro 6. Ben Shapiro 7. Ben Shapiro 8. Steven Crowder 9. Ben Shapiro 10. Franklin Graham<p>I won&#x27;t touch the platform anymore. It&#x27;s so out of touch.
stjohnswarts超过 3 年前
Looks like I jumped on the iPhone bandwagon just in time to cost facebook some money! (got my iphone ~1.5 yrs ago). What I don&#x27;t get is why iphone needs to scan your phone at all. I mean they literally have a treasure trove of information of most of their users, why do they need to sell that? Why don&#x27;t they just act use the megatons of info they already have on you from scanning your page and your messages to other users? They should be rolling in ad revenue without needing to spy on data on phones.
评论 #30211307 未加载
sixhobbits超过 3 年前
Maybe off topic but super ironic that I had managed to read the first sentence<p>&quot;POP-UP NOTIFICATIONS are often annoying.&quot;<p>and then got punched in the face by a huge cookie popup from Economist
andrei_says_超过 3 年前
Can we say that this puts a value on the non-consensual privacy violations that facebook’s business model depends on?
dmitriid超过 3 年前
&gt; Apple&#x27;s privacy push cost Meta $10B<p>It&#x27;s a false narrative that Facebook is pushing out: &quot;It&#x27; snot us that are bad, it&#x27;s this big bad Apple who are hurting our poor business&quot;.
sebow超过 3 年前
Correction: Apple&#x27;s war on FB&#x2F;Meta&#x2F;Zucc cost Meta $10B.<p>Let&#x27;s not disingenuously pretend they did it out their own good hearts and for people&#x27;s privacy: they did not. Also more people overly attribute this loss of Meta to Apple measure&#x27;s than general Meta trends.Meta&#x27;s rebranding, dystopian vision about the future and it&#x27;s anti-society effects though their business model which promotes less trust in the population is what brings up this number, not entirely Apple, not entirely Android.Then again outlets and people who do these kind of oversimplifications might aswell do it for sensationalism, since we need the same people to be explained the truth when something changes.
vincentmarle超过 3 年前
As the Dutch say: a cat that is backed into a corner, makes unpredictable jumps. And Zuckerberg is one really smart cat, with a lot of money at his disposal. So I wouldn’t rule him out yet.
eric4smith超过 3 年前
Lies.<p>Don’t you all see it? Facebook has been declining over the past year and this is a convenient way to blame someone - anyone.<p>Let’s face it, what are your friends all using now? That’s right - video - YouTube and TikTok.<p>Facebook had no answer for video and thus lost a lot of eyeballs.<p>Instagram is a poor clone of TikTok and most people just repost their popular TikTok videos on Instagram reels anyway - hardly any original videos show up there.<p>As the world transitions to short form video even YouTube is going to feel the pinch.<p>Don’t you notice every one of your favorite content creators starting “clip” channels which are blowing up with YouTube shorts and reposts to TikTok?<p>Facebook is beginning its long inevitable decline. Who knows if it will accelerate or just be a slow death?<p>And Zuck is very smart. The moment I saw the rebrand to Meta I knew that he saw this day coming perhaps years ago. He knows the next frontier is the meta verse and so he’s trying to make Facebook be the epicenter of it.<p>Who knows if it will work. But this has nothing if anything to do with Apple. And everything to do with the long term trends of history… or if you will, psychohistory.
评论 #30206993 未加载
评论 #30205970 未加载
评论 #30206222 未加载
评论 #30206552 未加载
评论 #30206619 未加载
评论 #30205913 未加载
评论 #30206000 未加载
评论 #30208138 未加载
评论 #30208972 未加载
评论 #30206776 未加载
评论 #30205865 未加载
评论 #30207391 未加载
评论 #30207560 未加载
评论 #30207910 未加载
评论 #30209400 未加载
评论 #30206892 未加载
评论 #30207114 未加载
评论 #30207713 未加载
评论 #30206381 未加载
评论 #30208456 未加载
评论 #30209331 未加载
gigatexal超过 3 年前
How can they make that number 10x bigger hrmm
lvl100超过 3 年前
What I don’t understand is why is this hitting them now? Those privacy features were turned on for awhile.
calebm超过 3 年前
This is quantitative proof that Facebook is extracting value directly from people&#x27;s private data.
martini333超过 3 年前
Why is every journalist blaming Apple&#x27;s Privacy. Like, use your brains, get a life.
评论 #30214439 未加载
bigyellow超过 3 年前
What&#x27;s Meta? You mean Facecrook, the spying and surveillance network?
ece超过 3 年前
Twitter killed Vine.
00000000005超过 3 年前
Facebook failed to pay the big money to Apple that they should have been paying for years.<p>If Zuck had been handing Apple $5,000,000,000 per year as google does, then Apple would never have kneecapped Facebook.<p>Larry and Sergei know how the protection racket works. You pay your dues to the local mob, you get to do business in their street corners.<p>What do google pay Apple $5b for? Ummm… to be in the search of Safari. Yeah right. They all know google simply pays Apple because they don’t want no trouble, so they say “Safari”, write a huge cheque, and google gets to keep doing business in Apple devices.<p>Tim is The Godfather. He who owns the platform owns the city. Everyone must respect and pay their dues, if they want to do business in this city.<p>Apple has sent Facebook to sleep with the fishes because zuck didn’t show no respect and didn’t pay no dues.
评论 #30205729 未加载
评论 #30205411 未加载
评论 #30205450 未加载
评论 #30205360 未加载
评论 #30205386 未加载
评论 #30205486 未加载
评论 #30205747 未加载
评论 #30205401 未加载
评论 #30205545 未加载
评论 #30205559 未加载
评论 #30205722 未加载
评论 #30205531 未加载
评论 #30205672 未加载
评论 #30205338 未加载
firechickenbird超过 3 年前
-$10bn is not enough. They are still able to read my brain somehow
matheusmoreira超过 3 年前
Apple probably has the power to kill the advertising industry. Wish it would use its gatekeeper position to do good for once.
评论 #30205028 未加载
评论 #30205326 未加载
评论 #30205430 未加载
评论 #30205578 未加载
评论 #30204984 未加载
评论 #30205334 未加载
评论 #30205604 未加载