Is it just me or is this a really poorly written article with questionable analysis?<p>For one, the graphs strike me as confusing. There's too much information trying to be packed into the graphs. It also appears that the various "utilization" measurements are the same on each graph. Furthermore, two completely different types of measurements are used for the "possession" metric, installed base for the U.S. market and quarterly sales for the global market.<p>Then, there is the questionable "utilization" metrics.<p>1. Browsing market share: Now, I don't know much about iOs, but on Android there are several different competitive browsers (Opera, Firefox, Dolphin) in addition to the stock browser. Could counting only the stock browser undercount the Android share?<p>2. Airport/in-flight market share: This is really a measure of what types of phones are used by people who do a lot of flying. Can any conclusions about general smartphone users be drawn from this data? If anything, it just shows that if you are trying to market to the jet-set, iOs is the way to go.<p>All-in-all it just strikes me a hand-wavy argument that iOs is superior to Android for development. I think there may be a way to make the case, but this certainly isn't it.