TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Fast File Finder for Windows is a tool for quickly finding files by name

67 点作者 disadvantage超过 3 年前

16 条评论

naikrovek超过 3 年前
Voidtools Everything is my go-to for this, if anyone was thinking "I want to know what naikrovek is using to find files by name..."
评论 #30224916 未加载
评论 #30225627 未加载
评论 #30226693 未加载
评论 #30228768 未加载
评论 #30225722 未加载
评论 #30231130 未加载
评论 #30225298 未加载
评论 #30232984 未加载
评论 #30225768 未加载
评论 #30226043 未加载
GrantZvolsky超过 3 年前
Once upon a time, back in the Vista days, I was looking for a file. I knew the name of the file, and I typed it into the brand new Search Pane. I waited, and waited, and waited... Until I decided to run something along the lines of `tree / > files.txt`. The tree command completed, I opened the result in Notepad, and found my file in no time, meanwhile the Search Pane was still searching. I don't have a Windows around to run the experiment in 2022, so I ask: Has Search not improved since the Vista days?
评论 #30228442 未加载
评论 #30228433 未加载
jakub_g超过 3 年前
BTW: Sumatra PDF by the same author is also worth checking.
评论 #30227162 未加载
morninglight超过 3 年前
Using "dir" on the Windows command line can do a simple search. It is on every Windows machine and easy to use. It is not the fastest but it can be useful. Amazing how few people know how to use it. Just type "help dir" from the Windows command line.
评论 #30231586 未加载
评论 #30227174 未加载
评论 #30226659 未加载
adhesive_wombat超过 3 年前
I&#x27;m looking for a working alternative to Albert or Rofi in Windows. It seems there are several dead projects like Cerebro that integrate with tools like Everything.<p>Crucially, it must be extensible so I can add domain specific plugins. Ideally I&#x27;d be able to reuse code between Windows and Linux, but I don&#x27;t see any cross platform ones, so maybe it&#x27;ll need shims.
评论 #30227622 未加载
评论 #30227673 未加载
评论 #30228312 未加载
评论 #30225677 未加载
Scramblejams超过 3 年前
What do y’all like for searching by file contents? For Windows and Linux?
评论 #30227748 未加载
评论 #30227920 未加载
评论 #30228061 未加载
评论 #30226639 未加载
评论 #30227495 未加载
评论 #30232403 未加载
评论 #30228152 未加载
评论 #30226007 未加载
twostorytower超过 3 年前
I wonder if anybody else remembers Google Desktop?
评论 #30230978 未加载
svnpenn超过 3 年前
My tool of choice:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;sharkdp&#x2F;fd" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;sharkdp&#x2F;fd</a>
chernevik超过 3 年前
Any Unix (including OSX) has &quot;find&quot; on the command line.
teknopaul超过 3 年前
FYI mlocate works on Windows.<p>Never had a PC without locate updated and grep
mickotron超过 3 年前
DIR &#x2F;b &#x2F;s
heywire超过 3 年前
My go to for this is Agent Ransack.
strijelac超过 3 年前
I&#x27;m using Listary. Very good.
Nuzzerino超过 3 年前
locate32 already does this just fine, been using it for years
desktopninja超过 3 年前
fascinating. Primarily use forfiles.exe or where.exe. Pwsh&#x27;s get-childitem is similarly as fast
civilized超过 3 年前
Why doesn&#x27;t Microsoft do this themselves? They&#x27;ve larded up Windows with tons of worthless crap, so clearly they have a lot of time of their hands. Why not give the user something useful for once, something that OS X users have had for decades?<p>Is the company full of morons, or do they just not see what&#x27;s in it for them? That is, why bother helping the user if it won&#x27;t necessarily make them $$$?<p>Sad as they are, I find these little details fascinating. They really show how unimaginative and short-term oriented giant public tech companies often are.<p>Apple ruining the MBP in 2016, only to walk back pretty much everything they did 6 years later, is another great example.
评论 #30226457 未加载
评论 #30226946 未加载
评论 #30225753 未加载
评论 #30225437 未加载
评论 #30225916 未加载
评论 #30225860 未加载