TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: What can we do after a giant impact event

9 点作者 lai-yin超过 3 年前
Doesn't have to be an asteroid. The Yellowstone supervolcano exploding would be catastrophic enough. What can we do within the limits of our technology to restore Earth's ecology to a safe level? Assuming we are adequately prepared before the event occurs.

9 条评论

hotpotamus超过 3 年前
I would say the greatest near-term risk to Earth's ecology is humans so probably the best preparation would be not to destroy it in the first place.
评论 #30238759 未加载
评论 #30238738 未加载
spaetzleesser超过 3 年前
After seeing how much trouble something relatively benign like Covid caused I think we would just fight each other. Countries/people with enough resources would make sure they are doing fine and the rest would have to figure something out.
gmuslera超过 3 年前
We have a slow motion impact event with climate change, that we didn&#x27;t do anything to avoid, and we are at a stage where trying to push the brakes when we are going at a 500mph and close enough to wall won&#x27;t help neither. And we are still accelerating.<p>We as civilization are not willing to prevent that event, nor able to fix&#x2F;repair what it will do, so what makes you think that we might be able to do anything with faster events like a supervolcano eruption or a big enough asteroid impact?
hhs超过 3 年前
There’s a good book called “The Precipice” (2020) by Toby Ord that suggests things people can do: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_Precipice:_Existential_Risk_and_the_Future_of_Humanity" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;The_Precipice:_Existential_Ris...</a>
aaronblohowiak超过 3 年前
literal and figurative re-seeding.<p>off the top of my head, given unlimited budget, I&#x27;d probably have a massive vault of seeds (not just in variety, in quantity, too,) and adequate staff in rotations in a deep-sea bunker. not near a fault line, but deep enough that surface conditions are less likely to impact (no pun intended). Sea vs land because &quot;digging your way out&quot; become less of a problem. If you had a truly unlimited budget, one could imagine an Ark of embryos and a sufficient population of young does of each animal species you sought to preserve.
评论 #30238886 未加载
评论 #30238921 未加载
jsiaajdsdaa超过 3 年前
In the last major extinction event, it was the scrappy and efficient bottom feeders who survived, and the big dopey apex predators and megafauna who didn&#x27;t.
boznz超过 3 年前
Well moving to New Zealand wont help (Sorry Mr Billionaires)
hogrider超过 3 年前
Pretty sure this will remain the realm of scifi for the next couple dozen decades.
cc101超过 3 年前
mmm... Learn to fly? It worked for the dinosaurs.