TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

80% of financial resources in US are controlled by 10% of its population.

5 点作者 akarambir超过 13 年前

4 条评论

pash超过 13 年前
Our admirably good-hearted Iranian despot was anticipated in his observation by Vilfredo Pareto, who in 1906 noticed that about 20% of Italians held 80% of Italy's wealth. Similar proportions have since been noticed in many societies around the world throughout the past century, among them the United States today. (In 2007, the wealthiest 20% of Americans owned 84.6% of the nation's <i>total</i> wealth, as opposed to just <i>financial</i> wealth, says a UC-Santa Cruz sociologist. [1])<p>The phenomenon of 20% of a population accounting for 80% of a quantity is quite widespread, and not only in economics. For example, in classifying life-forms with binomial nomenclature, about 80% of all species are in "largest" 20% of genera; about 80% of the world's oil reserves are in the largest 20% of oil fields; about 80% of the grains of sand on a beach are in the lowest two deciles by size; etc. This feature is so common that it's called the "80-20 rule." [2]<p>Though the mechanism behind this phenomenon remains in most cases a bit of a mystery, in statistical terms the 80-20 rule arises in populations described by a Pareto distribution. [3] The Pareto distribution belongs to the family of power-law distributions, whose functional forms have an in-built self-similarity; the 80-20 rule applies even to itself. So the wealthiest 4% (20% of 20%) of the population owns about 64% (80% of 80%) of America's wealth, and so on.<p>1. See esp. Table 1 at <a href="http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html" rel="nofollow">http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html</a><p>2. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_principle" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_principle</a><p>3. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_distribution" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_distribution</a>
tzs超过 13 年前
I find these kind of statements pointless. Given any thing that is not distributed equally, it is mathematically necessary that the top N% of the people who have that thing have more than N% of that thing.<p>For instance, the fattest 10% of the population have more than 10% of the total weight of the population. The top 10% promiscuous women have more than 10% of the total sex. The top 10% of authors by number of books published have more than 10% of the books published. And so on and so on.
phamilton超过 13 年前
Best explanation I've ever read:<p><a href="http://www.paulgraham.com/wealth.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.paulgraham.com/wealth.html</a>
algopats超过 13 年前
financial industry has the capacity for 10 facebook like startups - currently its all Five big banks, five big IB/trading, wall.st banks etc.<p>There is huge opportunity here for innovation in finance industry, as all(most) of its functionalities can be reduced to computation.<p>Obviously the Wall.St insiders dont want any innovation, they are glad earning avg 500K-to-mil total compensation for starters. (3 years in, you could potentially make min. mil total compensation)<p>Dont understand why all the startups/ventures in silicon valley go after social networking - how many groupons, or photo/message/social do we need ?
评论 #3037102 未加载