TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Google Maps ToS can be summarised as: Don't use it

68 点作者 gieksosz超过 3 年前

5 条评论

jsnell超过 3 年前
Literally everything in the tweet is incorrect.<p>- The caching policy is defined per-API [0]. The generic TOS just says that the default state if the per-API TOS says nothing is &quot;no caching&quot;. Most of them allow caching for 30 days.<p>- The &quot;no derivative works&quot; clause that the author thinks would be illegal explicitly says that it&#x27;s forbidden to the extent that the law allows it to be forbidden, just like all TOS do. (It&#x27;s also talking just about the source code, which I certainly wasn&#x27;t expecting from the tweet.)<p>- The &quot;don&#x27;t use in a non-Google app&quot; bit appears to be a complete fabrication. There is nothing like it in the TOS. The only thing even remotely close to it is that it&#x27;s saying you must use the APIs, not scrape data from a Google app to use outside of the app.<p>- Benchmarking isn&#x27;t forbbiden. What&#x27;s forbidden is public disclosure of the benchmark results, unless there is enough information for somebody to replicate the tests.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cloud.google.com&#x2F;maps-platform&#x2F;terms&#x2F;maps-service-terms" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;cloud.google.com&#x2F;maps-platform&#x2F;terms&#x2F;maps-service-te...</a>
评论 #30403799 未加载
评论 #30408452 未加载
wepple超过 3 年前
There are plenty of websites by actual lawyers who summarize ToS for regular folks. This collection of tweets appears to be written by someone severely under qualified to comment, who wants to be angry on the internet.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;tosdr.org" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;tosdr.org</a> for example
评论 #30396705 未加载
timmythe超过 3 年前
I haved lived in a major 3rd world megacity for over a decade. I know the public transportation system quite well but still rely on google maps for time calculation, routes to new places, and using their yellow pages listings.<p>That being said i noticed recently what i would consider unethical behavior in the app and a major breach in the public trust.<p>When you ask for routing options in public transport it gives you the option in-app to add a scheduled pickup by 99 Taxis or Uber to the final leg of your journey. No problem there.<p>The problem is for those who prefer walkinag that last leg. the public transport options suggested to us cheapskates can be as much as 40 minutes longer than those with in-app purchases bundled. I could not find a way to select the better option in the app.
评论 #30396510 未加载
vander_elst超过 3 年前
The tweet mentions &quot;Do not use outside of Google applications, for instance on a non-google app&quot; is this a citation from the TOS or an interpretation of what is saying? I could not find the paragraph where this is mentioned.
评论 #30396135 未加载
评论 #30396161 未加载
otagekki超过 3 年前
Well, is that really a surprise? TOS of free services nowadays are designed to be bulletproof and whoever dares to challenge it is in for a financially draining lawsuit...
评论 #30396187 未加载
评论 #30396113 未加载
评论 #30396186 未加载