TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Newly published 9/11 footage [video]

257 点作者 guidovranken大约 3 年前

16 条评论

techdragon大约 3 年前
Definitely a new angle, but it’s also strange after so many years to find good footage like this. The random extra stuff at the end make it feel very genuinely “found an old miniDV tape with some footage of forgotten about.”<p>But it’s also just really weird to hear people talking so clearly the moment after it happens. It’s preserved a slightly surreal moment of shock quite well.
评论 #30476858 未加载
评论 #30479011 未加载
smoyer大约 3 年前
Something that this angle shows (and that other footage I&#x27;ve seen hints at) is that the second plane would have missed the tower without a pretty serious turn in the last few seconds. That plane is screaming (we&#x27;re used to a jet that size flying with it&#x27;s flaps and landing gear down if (roughly) level at that altitude. This turn would have been higher than normal G forces!
评论 #30478904 未加载
m348e912大约 3 年前
It&#x27;s crazy that someone sat on the footage for 21 years and it just got made public now. Makes you wonder what else other footage or details are out there that has yet to be shared online.
评论 #30476848 未加载
mgdlbp大约 3 年前
Fascinating are the words of netizens of the time in guestbooks, forums, and homepages of sites large and small that have been immortalized in the Internet Archive [a].<p>The Internet Archive also has an extensive collection of televised news footage from ‑‑09‑11 and the following weeks; I&#x27;m often reminded by its prominent placement in the &#x27;Video&#x27; section of their navbar. Ironically, both their original 9&#x2F;11 web collection (assembled by the Library of Congress shortly after the event) and the related Pew reports on internet use following 9&#x2F;11 are lost to time; remnants can only be found in the Wayback Machine [0]. For whatever reason, it was replaced with one apparently curated by the September 11 Museum around 2008 [1].<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20011014012316&#x2F;http:&#x2F;&#x2F;september11.archive.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20011014012316&#x2F;http:&#x2F;&#x2F;september1...</a><p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.archive-it.org&#x2F;collections&#x2F;1029" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.archive-it.org&#x2F;collections&#x2F;1029</a><p>[a] an aside: I find the archived sites of schools (of all kinds) from the time particularly captivating. Perhaps the abridgement of time enhances their liminal nature. Or maybe it&#x27;s the feeling of sincerity in guestbook messages and the personal homepages of students and staff.
pygar大约 3 年前
The word &quot;terrorism&quot; wasn&#x27;t yet in the common vernacular. The people in the video were having a hard time articulating what they saw &quot;That was a..dead on kill, he did it on purpose!&quot;.
评论 #30486931 未加载
melling大约 3 年前
We see the plane around 2:05.
评论 #30477169 未加载
rendall大约 3 年前
Back in 2001&#x2F;2002, I went to a series of seminars hosted by the artist Natalie Jeremijenko. One of the presenting artists had footage of the Pentagon attack, taken from a camera he had set up on the Potomac River. He refused to give anyone else access to it. &quot;I want to think about how to best present this footage.&quot; he said. I still have never seen that footage again to this day, and the selfishness makes me angry whenever I think of it.
评论 #30477940 未加载
评论 #30478011 未加载
Simon_O_Rourke大约 3 年前
I was in NYC that week, visiting my in-laws, to be honest I&#x27;ve avoided watching this, because it&#x27;s trauma is still raw, and viewing it again isn&#x27;t going to provide any closure for me.
ydnaclementine大约 3 年前
Shoutout to the guy at 2:45 who was able to immediately identify the second plane as a United plane
nobrains大约 3 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;o6t31R4tI10?t=123" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;o6t31R4tI10?t=123</a><p>Second plane
mhb大约 3 年前
YouTube doesn&#x27;t have that image stabilization any more?
pcdoodle大约 3 年前
Same pre impact flash is seen in this one as well (6:00).
评论 #30558216 未加载
davidmurdoch大约 3 年前
The &quot;(2001)&quot; makes it seem like this is a link to a video titled &quot;Newly published 9&#x2F;11 footage&quot; that was posted in 2001. Maybe &quot;Newly published 2001&#x2F;09&#x2F;11 footage&quot; would be a better title?
评论 #30479521 未加载
throwaway5486nv大约 3 年前
Structural engineers please explain how can a tall concrete building collapse when hit in the middle?
评论 #30481838 未加载
kungito大约 3 年前
is there anything new?
评论 #30477016 未加载
TacticalCoder大约 3 年前
I&#x27;ll just say this: many here are convinced our AI overlords have landed and we&#x27;ll soon all be out of jobs and deepfakes are undistinguishable from the real thing.<p>So I&#x27;ll say this: if you believe AI is advanced, then in 2022 it&#x27;s not possible to take this video for granted and you have to take into account that all evidence surfacing from now may be deepfakes. I&#x27;m not saying they are: I&#x27;m saying you have to keep that in mind.
评论 #30478359 未加载
评论 #30480026 未加载
评论 #30479121 未加载
评论 #30480816 未加载
评论 #30478780 未加载