TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Static torrent website with peer-to-peer queries over BitTorrent on 2M records

575 点作者 voigt大约 3 年前

20 条评论

pizza大约 3 年前
Yup. Calling it. This is the future, may not seem like it to everyone but this is a part of actually new and extremely useful, passively scalable technology. Imagine (good) unkillable zombie databases- so long as the name of a piece of data is known (its hash).. someone, somewhere, might make it possible for you to answer your query, without even needing to setup a server setup.. that’s _it_! Not to mention it might be faster than the original source.<p>Pretty damn powerful. The next level above this is a search index that lets the <i>user</i> generate their <i>own</i> results, using their own machine learning algorithm or ranking weights of their own preferences, bc they would have <i>direct</i> access to the DB index and features. People could wrote anti-ad plugins. There could be foss upgrades all the time. Nobody would have to spend a particularly crazy amount of money on storage if they could all just cache the bits they’d needed themselves. Quite remarkable imo!! Whatever ends Google search’s reign, will probably be user-owned in a way that seems a lot like this..
评论 #30608910 未加载
评论 #30611237 未加载
评论 #30611330 未加载
评论 #30609016 未加载
评论 #30612612 未加载
评论 #30608213 未加载
评论 #30621806 未加载
评论 #30610436 未加载
评论 #30608733 未加载
评论 #30617837 未加载
评论 #30614516 未加载
评论 #30608992 未加载
评论 #30612820 未加载
qwertox大约 3 年前
My biggest issue with storing data inside the browser is the lack of tools to set up filter rules for clearing or explicitly not clearing website-specific application data.<p>Looking at Chrome&#x27;s Inspector, Application Storage has &quot;Local Storage&quot;, &quot;Session Storage&quot;, &quot;IndexedDB&quot;, &quot;WebSQL&quot; and &quot;Cookies&quot;.<p>If I decide to clear all this stored data stored for all the pages with one button press in the settings, how can I be sure I&#x27;m excluding something important? Or if I install a new extension which helps me manage privacy, how can I be sure that it won&#x27;t delete all this data because I forgot to add a site to its whitelist?
评论 #30615659 未加载
评论 #30613735 未加载
loxias大约 3 年前
This simply solidifies my opinion that SQLite is one of the Best Tools Ever.
评论 #30612193 未加载
yjftsjthsd-h大约 3 年前
Does the lazy loading combined with the torrent mean that you can lose individual rows if nobody has accessed them recently?
评论 #30611244 未加载
评论 #30611095 未加载
评论 #30611435 未加载
ajconway大约 3 年前
It would be interesting to understand why ipfs was so slow in prior experiments.
评论 #30608755 未加载
AviationAtom大约 3 年前
Heads up that some of the search results are probably NSFW, so it might be a better one to check out at home.
评论 #30609736 未加载
chatmasta大约 3 年前
Inspired by this, can anyone explain why distributed protocols more often opt for centralized consensus algorithms like Raft, instead of decentralized schemes like Chord or Kademlia? In all cases, the underlying data structure is a shared key&#x2F;value store. Intuitively, the p2p approach feels more robust, since each node only needs to worry about itself, and every node is the same. So why add the coordinator node? Is it still the right choice in $current_year, even after so many hours of development invested into strong p2p consensus protocols like libp2p powering Ethereum (currently ~11k nodes btw, not actually that big – and many operated by small number of entities)?
评论 #30611024 未加载
Aloha大约 3 年前
a decade ago, I had the idea of a distributed internet wide filesystem where the chunks could be duplicated over and over again over the internet. Something survivable and loosely&#x2F;eventually consistent when updated.<p>Someone appears to have built at least part of it.
评论 #30610553 未加载
评论 #30618385 未加载
评论 #30649085 未加载
gw67大约 3 年前
For video file could you open a webtorrent video player instead of linking to magnet?
catmanjan大约 3 年前
Can someone explain this pro: &quot;Database size and number of records are not a problem&quot;<p>How is this the case if earlier there is a &quot;limitation of not being able to ask ONLY for pieces I&#x27;m interested in&quot;?
评论 #30613196 未加载
asadlionpk大约 3 年前
Since ipfs is hash addressable, is there a decentralized way to point to the latest hash of the content. I can point a domain to it, but domain can be taken down.
评论 #30610245 未加载
评论 #30609847 未加载
评论 #30609641 未加载
est大约 3 年前
This is cool but if I understand it right, it&#x27;s actually WebTorrent protocol via WebRTC, not inter-torrentable of vanilla BitTorrents out there?
评论 #30610353 未加载
can16358p大约 3 年前
Went to live demo, I searched for &quot;South Park&quot; and I just got many porn results?
RobertMiller大约 3 年前
All of this seems very familiar; I recall similar claims being made about torrent-paradise.ml (domain now dead); it was a static site, unkillable, db distributed on IPFS, etc.<p>Is there any relationship between these two projects, or are the similarities only incidental?
sergiotapia大约 3 年前
Getting no results and error: &quot;WebRTC: ICE failed, add a TURN server and see about:webrtc for more details&quot; in Firefox latest.
评论 #30608826 未加载
评论 #30608695 未加载
EGreg大约 3 年前
How does this compare with:<p><pre><code> IPFS &#x2F; Filecoin Dat &#x2F; Hypercore PouchDB &#x2F; CouchDB</code></pre>
forgotmyoldacc大约 3 年前
Is the demo down for anyone else? It&#x27;s stuck loading. Chrome on MacOS
评论 #30611382 未加载
grae_QED大约 3 年前
What a fantastic idea! Thanks for sharing!
Alphatx大约 3 年前
in the past I also tried to use the system with ipfs instead of webtorrent. but I got errors with CORS ...
morelish大约 3 年前
Seems interesting. Not sure I see it taking off.