TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Neutral DNS servers?

132 点作者 NotAWorkNick大约 3 年前
Hi HN - Here’s a question that I hope will generate some useful comments, suggestions and links.<p>Background for question: I normally run an internal DNS resolver with an upstream pool of 10-15 providers. These are normally a mix of Global Anycast servers (Quad9 etc) with some OpenNIC, YandexDNS etc thrown in towards the end to cover the ‘chilling effects’ blackholes.<p>Currently Yandex DNS is pinging a timeout (either due to black-holing or DDOS’ing depending on where I connect To&#x2F;From).<p>My question to HN is this – Given my ‘Information Wants To Be Free’ viewpoint, are there any DNS equivalents of Switzerland (WWII, Neutral to all parties) providers?

24 条评论

neilalexander大约 3 年前
You could just run a recursive resolver yourself by using the root hints. You don&#x27;t need to delegate your DNS queries onto a third-party resolver like Quad9.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.iana.org&#x2F;domains&#x2F;root&#x2F;files" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.iana.org&#x2F;domains&#x2F;root&#x2F;files</a>
评论 #30642847 未加载
评论 #30645896 未加载
nfriedly大约 3 年前
I know this isn&#x27;t quite what your asking for, but one idea is to set up a Pi-hole + unbound: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.pi-hole.net&#x2F;guides&#x2F;dns&#x2F;unbound&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.pi-hole.net&#x2F;guides&#x2F;dns&#x2F;unbound&#x2F;</a><p>Unbound is basically your own private DNS resolver and then Pi-hole lets you filter out whatever &quot;junk&quot; you don&#x27;t want.
评论 #30646020 未加载
评论 #30650014 未加载
评论 #30649179 未加载
评论 #30646045 未加载
评论 #30646896 未加载
nobody9999大约 3 年前
&gt;My question to HN is this – Given my ‘Information Wants To Be Free’ viewpoint, are there any DNS equivalents of Switzerland (WWII, Neutral to all parties) providers?<p>Presumably the root and authoritative servers. Which is why I use a local recursive resolver rather than any upstream&#x2F;third party resolvers.<p>You should try it. It&#x27;s easy and fun!
nimbius大约 3 年前
Google DNS should at this point be considered harmful. Devs love to hardcode it in resolvd because &#x27;user experience&#x27; but there&#x27;s ample evidence its just analytics.<p>Quad 1 cloudflare is reliable doh but comes from a company with a history of bloviating nonsense about internet freedom only to eagerly capitulate to Twitter lynchmobs and blacklist a customer or ten.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;dnscrypt.info&#x2F;public-servers&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;dnscrypt.info&#x2F;public-servers&#x2F;</a> will give you a nice list of doh to try out. Ymmv however as many are sporadic.
评论 #30647173 未加载
评论 #30646203 未加载
celsoazevedo大约 3 年前
If you already run your own DNS resolver, query the root servers directly. No need to trust DNS providers when you can do the same thing yourself.
评论 #30645871 未加载
nmjohn大约 3 年前
Given you only mention censorship&#x2F;chilling effect and not privacy - why isn&#x27;t 8.8.8.8 sufficient? Have there been instances of domains it censored and stopped resolving that I&#x27;m not aware of?<p>I guess I&#x27;m confused on the benefit (theoretical or practical) one would get by using that variety of resolvers. Is it just to prevent theoretical censorship at the DNS level?
评论 #30645860 未加载
评论 #30646622 未加载
yegor大约 3 年前
Shameless self promotion: Try Control D - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;controld.com&#x2F;free-dns" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;controld.com&#x2F;free-dns</a><p>There are many different types of resolvers, blocking and unfiltered. We&#x27;re adding global ECH support in the coming weeks. There is also a paid plan if you need more control.
schleck8大约 3 年前
ControlD, DNS.sb and LibreDNS for instance. The latter two are open source.<p>I think non-disciminating DNS providers are rather the norm and not an exception though.
评论 #30643652 未加载
kseistrup大约 3 年前
You could try Uncensored DNS: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.uncensoreddns.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.uncensoreddns.org&#x2F;</a>
评论 #30645417 未加载
mike_d大约 3 年前
<p><pre><code> 103.196.38.3 103.196.38.8 </code></pre> Globally anycasted plain vanilla name resolution. I don&#x27;t publicize it because I don&#x27;t have anything to gain from more users, but you are free to use them.
评论 #30650097 未加载
loxias大约 3 年前
It&#x27;s really not that hard to just run your own DNS server locally. Then you&#x27;re not beholden to anyone. I recommend it.
btdmaster大约 3 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.opennic.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.opennic.org&#x2F;</a> and downstream providers from there are quite good: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;servers.opennic.org&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;servers.opennic.org&#x2F;</a>
评论 #30650114 未加载
stranded22大约 3 年前
Personally, I use nextdns on a paid plan (£17&#x2F;year). Full control, can change to no logs, or logs stored in Switzerland. They have a free plan too
评论 #30645525 未加载
c0l0大约 3 年前
I run and use <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;resolv.us.to&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;resolv.us.to&#x2F;</a> - you may do the latter, too.
nix23大约 3 年前
&gt;Given my ‘Information Wants To Be Free’ viewpoint, are there any DNS equivalents of Switzerland<p>That&#x27;s exactly why Quad9 changed it&#x27;s HQ to Switzerland:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.switch.ch&#x2F;news&#x2F;quad9-moves-to-Switzerland&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.switch.ch&#x2F;news&#x2F;quad9-moves-to-Switzerland&#x2F;</a>
评论 #30647867 未加载
matoro大约 3 年前
I use dnscrypt-proxy[0] which round-robins to a bunch of upstream servers, plus encryption.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;DNSCrypt&#x2F;dnscrypt-proxy" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;DNSCrypt&#x2F;dnscrypt-proxy</a>
BrandoElFollito大约 3 年前
Question after reading (very interesting) answers: what is the downsize using the root servers instead of the well-known ones? (1.1.1.1, 8.8.8.8, ...)<p>Is it the cache that improves resolution speed in a meaningful way?
评论 #30647152 未加载
jiveturkey大约 3 年前
huh. Why aren&#x27;t you simply querying the roots and from there the SOA for any domain?
评论 #30646429 未加载
pabs3大约 3 年前
I just do this to get a neutral DNSSEC supporting recursive DNS resolver:<p>apt install unbound
snovv_crash大约 3 年前
You could try using a DNS provider that&#x27;s actually in Switzerland...
amitbakhru大约 3 年前
1.1.1.1 1.0.0.1
评论 #30650088 未加载
upnick大约 3 年前
You might want to look up &quot;geo-politically stable&quot; web hosting. Aside from that, Epik.com has traditionally been quite supportive of free speech (even if it&#x27;s Trump supporters).
moltke大约 3 年前
The DNS (as it exists today) is supposed to be the equivalent of Switzerland. The internet community has said over and over again they&#x27;re not interested in censoring the internet or removing any group of people from it.<p>It sounds like what you really want is your own recursive resolver.
axiosgunnar大约 3 年前
Note that even Switzerland could not stay neutral this time and enacted severe sanctions against Russia.<p>Maybe staying neutral has the higher cost to a free society (and thus „information wanting to be free“) in the long term?