TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ivermectin Didn’t Reduce Covid-19 Hospitalizations in Largest Trial to Date

217 点作者 elmalto大约 3 年前

22 条评论

imgabe大约 3 年前
The whole Ivermectin debacle was ridiculous.<p>I never had Covid. Or if I did, it was so mild I never noticed. So, I really have no dog in this fight. But the way the media handled this coverage was really, really off-putting.<p>First, if it doesn&#x27;t work, just say that. &quot;It doesn&#x27;t work&quot;. &quot;Ivermectin is not an effective treatment for Covid&quot;. That&#x27;s all that was really necessary, right?<p>But no, there was this whole ridiculous crusade of &quot;It&#x27;s a horsey drug for horses! If you take it, that means you&#x27;re a horse!&quot;. Which, after two seconds of consideration, was patently absurd. It&#x27;s an extremely commonly prescribed drug for people. And there&#x27;s plenty of drugs that are used for both people and animals. Ketamine. Antibiotics. We give antibiotics to horses too. So does that mean if you take antibiotics you&#x27;re some whackjob taking horse drugs?<p>So now you have the media constantly repeating something which anyone with two brain cells can discern is a blatant lie, and they somehow wonder why people don&#x27;t trust them?
评论 #30721095 未加载
评论 #30721459 未加载
评论 #30721748 未加载
评论 #30721146 未加载
评论 #30721473 未加载
评论 #30722847 未加载
评论 #30722111 未加载
评论 #30721285 未加载
评论 #30722056 未加载
评论 #30721415 未加载
评论 #30727183 未加载
评论 #30721097 未加载
评论 #30721156 未加载
评论 #30721093 未加载
jiggawatts大约 3 年前
Ivermectin works because the first trials were done in developing economies where the average person had a high chance of parasitic infections. The steroids used as a standard front-line treatment for severe COVID decreases the immune response to parasites, allowing them to multiply unchecked. This killed patients indirectly, but <i>dead is dead</i>, and they &quot;checked in&quot; with COVID, not parasite complaints.<p>Ivermectin is a wildly effective anti-parasitic, so unsurprisingly it reduces mortality rates in countries where the endemic parasite infection rate is something like 50 percent.<p>This study appears to have been done in Canada, where parasite infection rates in the general population are probably 1% or less. Hence... no demonstrable benefit to using Ivermectin!<p>Nonetheless, Ivermectin is safe drug to take in normal doses, and <i>will</i> help people that are hospitalised with COVID and are given steroids.<p>It&#x27;s not a prophylactic and high doses are not a treatment for COVID itself.<p>The misunderstandings around this drug stem from misunderstandings of basic statistics and the scientific method. This is why you shouldn&#x27;t get your medical advice from Joe Rogan.
评论 #30721298 未加载
评论 #30720944 未加载
评论 #30720911 未加载
评论 #30721858 未加载
评论 #30720821 未加载
评论 #30721625 未加载
评论 #30721656 未加载
评论 #30721549 未加载
评论 #30721036 未加载
评论 #30723001 未加载
评论 #30720816 未加载
评论 #30722061 未加载
评论 #30722425 未加载
评论 #30726079 未加载
评论 #30722241 未加载
评论 #30722202 未加载
评论 #30722558 未加载
评论 #30722239 未加载
评论 #30723232 未加载
评论 #30731982 未加载
评论 #30721364 未加载
评论 #30721376 未加载
评论 #30722103 未加载
评论 #30721277 未加载
评论 #30721435 未加载
评论 #30734562 未加载
评论 #30722160 未加载
评论 #30720906 未加载
janmarsal大约 3 年前
I don&#x27;t get it. I don&#x27;t understand anything about medicine but as far as I know the Japanese used ivermectin to treat COVID so it&#x27;s not just some developing countries that use it. I&#x27;m from Finland and our national news company even reported about some Finnish pharma companies that developed a nasal spay that could treat COVID. That nasal spray included ivermectin and they said it&#x27;s such a shame ivermectin has such a bad press because supposedly some yanks overdosed on horse dewormer after listening to Joe Rogan too much, but they still insisted that it&#x27;s an effective drug to treat COVID. I don&#x27;t know what to believe anymore. To me it seems that not even the trustworthy media can&#x27;t decide whether it&#x27;s effective or not.<p>The most bizarre part of this whole ordeal is how there was such a huge backlash to ivermectin usage as if it was some kind of a dangerous drug when that&#x27;s clearly not the case. Even my layman&#x27;s knowledge is enough to understand that much. If it&#x27;s placebo at worst then why did the media try to demonize it so hard?
评论 #30721601 未加载
评论 #30721754 未加载
评论 #30721944 未加载
评论 #30721720 未加载
评论 #30721533 未加载
评论 #30721671 未加载
cersa8大约 3 年前
Isn&#x27;t Ivermectin most effective at the onset of symptoms [0] ? From the article &quot;They looked at data from all patients; then analyzed data from patients who received ivermectin or a placebo 24 hours before they were hospitalized&quot; This sounds like Ivermectin was given when symptoms where so severe, hospitalization was required. This could well be too late for Ivermectin to be effective.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ijidonline.com&#x2F;article&#x2F;S1201-9712(20)32506-6&#x2F;fulltext" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.ijidonline.com&#x2F;article&#x2F;S1201-9712(20)32506-6&#x2F;ful...</a>
评论 #30721993 未加载
Tade0大约 3 年前
In my corner in the world the miracle drug was Amantadine(Gocovri) - used in the past to treat influenza, but not recommended anymore.<p>Also no effect, as show by an appropriate study, but that didn&#x27;t stop a friend of a friend from trying to obtain it instead of going to a doctor. He failed and eventually succumbed to the illness.
maskil大约 3 年前
The &quot;largest trial to date&quot; does not mean that it&#x27;s case closed.<p>While the case for Ivermectin has been weakened recently, there still seems a significant body of evidence to suggest that it does work.<p>Many (not discredited) trials show efficacy and there is a significant observational correlation between population mass consumption of Ivermectin and better results with Covid. There are also many doctors that swear by it&#x27;s efficacy from their experience.<p>Trials aren&#x27;t perfect. The drug companies have been manipulating trial data for decades to prove efficacy when there wasn&#x27;t, it probably can be done the other way as well. And the incentive is there with such a politicized drug.
评论 #30722232 未加载
mhxion大约 3 年前
Link without the paywall: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wsj.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;ivermectin-didnt-reduce-covid-19-hospitalizations-in-largest-trial-to-date-11647601200?st=v2bvudfsllip5py" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wsj.com&#x2F;articles&#x2F;ivermectin-didnt-reduce-covid-1...</a>
评论 #30804572 未加载
bsuvc大约 3 年前
I&#x27;ve never understood why ivermectin is such a hot button issue that gets people worked up.<p>If someone else has a doctor that prescribes it to them, and a pharmacy that fills the prescription, that should not be a problem, right?<p>It&#x27;s not like they are telling people they have to take ivermectin against their will.<p>What am I missing?
评论 #30721923 未加载
评论 #30723433 未加载
评论 #30723244 未加载
snidane大约 3 年前
While the ivermectin story is largely explained by the confounding factor of parasite presence in developing countries, it indirectly helped covid patients by curing them of other problems and thus reducing the potence of covid. Not so much in the developed countries since the parasite problem was small.<p>Concerning though, was the society&#x27;s attitude to the Ivermectin, an safe drug prescribed by WHO in Africa en masse, established for decades, versus an experimental vaccine-like treatment with unknown side effects and never tested at scale that was to be deployed population wide.<p>At the time of no studies, no information and heavy panic, one of these was condemned, likened to a horse paste for conspiracy theorists, the other revered like a God&#x27;s potion.<p>This attitude is perfectly rational for pharma companies, for which a vaccine is a better business model, with healthy 95% of the population being customers, than a drug with sick 5% being the customers. Especially for an is off-patent drug Ivermectin which is just a pain in the ass for pharma producers, with no monopoly markup on it.<p>The behavior is not rational for the general populace though. Once country&#x27;s biggest villains, pharma companies injecting patients unknowingly with opiods, turning them into lifetime subscribers, to world&#x27;s biggest saviors like a flip of a switch.<p>It was interesting to observe how the pandemic was progressing with a rational attitude as somebody who went through it and developed an immunity right at the beginning. It helped me understand how the minds can be overriden at scale using tactics of fear. Helps explain other dangerous ideologies that were pushed to the populations using fear.<p>Vaccines and Ivermectin are old news though. Who would have though that Vladimir Putin would become the world&#x27;s most successful doctor and cure the world of the pandemic overnight.
评论 #30722289 未加载
评论 #30721524 未加载
ImHereToVote大约 3 年前
From the article &quot;They looked at data from all patients; then analyzed data from patients who received ivermectin or a placebo 24 hours before they were hospitalized&quot;<p>24 hours!? How is that reasonable at all?
mcwone大约 3 年前
Because of paywall, I&#x27;m not sure what study the wsj was referring to but there was a study in JAMA in which Norman Fenton from Queens College commented on which I found interesting: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.normanfenton.com&#x2F;post&#x2F;study-claiming-ivermectin-fails-actually-shows-a-much-lower-death-rate-in-those-who-received-it" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.normanfenton.com&#x2F;post&#x2F;study-claiming-ivermectin-...</a>
chiefalchemist大约 3 年前
This is going to be an unpopular statement of fact but...<p>It&#x27;s worth pointing out, the study - intentionally? - offers no insights on deaths rates or length of hospital stay, etc.<p>The scope as is is: Test positive. Receive a treatment. To hospital or not to hospital? But why stop there?<p>In fact, as is, you can flip it over and say placebos are just as effective as Ivermectin, as there&#x27;s no mention of a no treatment at all control. Or did I miss that?<p>In any case, helpful. But apparently flawed.
PaulHoule大约 3 年前
… the point was never to promote the belief that ivermectin was effective so much as to create the idea that there was a controversy about it in a world view where controversy for the sake of controversy is valorized.
Pinegulf大约 3 年前
Pity, yet honest person must follow where the evidence leads.
cf141q5325大约 3 年前
Can anyone link the study? Cant get around the paywall
JoeyBananas大约 3 年前
Some studies say it does, some say it doesn&#x27;t
senectus1大约 3 年前
interesting, but largest ever? not according to this: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=Gz4adJXLHgA" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=Gz4adJXLHgA</a><p>which got <i>very</i> different results
评论 #30721071 未加载
评论 #30720899 未加载
albertTJames大约 3 年前
Big surprise
WaxedChewbacca大约 3 年前
Meanwhile, back in reality, ivermectin is associated with 70%-ish reductions in hospitalization and death. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=Gz4adJXLHgA" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=Gz4adJXLHgA</a>
评论 #30723374 未加载
rbut大约 3 年前
c19early.com [1] lists numerous studies for Ivermectin and other drugs in the use of treating COVID-19 for both early treatment, and throughout all stages.<p>Ivermectin currently sits at an average efficacy of 65% after 81 studies.<p>So in reality, this study that WSJ cites should be added to the pool of efficacy, and not used to completely debunk Ivermectin.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;c19early.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;c19early.com&#x2F;</a>
评论 #30733707 未加载
belter大约 3 年前
We did not eliminate pandemics. Instead, as a Society we barely made it through this one. Despite the massive human and economic cost of this latest pandemic, governments are making the same mistakes again:<p>- Lack of preparation.<p>- Not enough resources allocated to research.<p>- Too much reliance on Pharma and particularly Vaccine producing companies.<p>The best research is still done mostly via foundations or private funding. Some of the most interesting work is still ongoing.<p>At the UK Recovery Study: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.recoverytrial.net&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.recoverytrial.net&#x2F;</a><p>They are investigating several treatments including Ivermectin. Results so far here:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.recoverytrial.net&#x2F;results" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.recoverytrial.net&#x2F;results</a><p>Also the PRINCIPLE Study is investigating Ivermectin with no published results yet. They were able to publish some results for other treatments already.<p>Principle Results:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.principletrial.org&#x2F;results" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.principletrial.org&#x2F;results</a><p>The EU also has EU-Response initiative with Study results here:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;eu-response.eu&#x2F;results&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;eu-response.eu&#x2F;results&#x2F;</a>
评论 #30721115 未加载
jleyank大约 3 年前
Given that the activity of ivermectin was orthogonal to covid (virus vs parasite), they were looking for a side effect that would help. Pretty much every drug that was legally approved was tried when covid appeared to get something that might help. They could be immediately prescribed if something was found.<p>It’s a good comment re reducing the parasite load to improve health, but as others pointed out that’s not common in the countries initially hit by covid. Once politics and hearsay took over, logical discussion ended. For any viral infection, the recourse is vaccination, antivirals and reducing the symptoms. The rise of mAB meant that the effect of vaccination could be immediately applied, which was a new improvement for treatment. Vaccines and antivirals take time to develop, mAB require survivors and they’re all “foreign substances and&#x2F;or proteins”. The woo and political folks don’t want that.<p>The world is very lucky covid was much closer to the flu than Ebola. Unless the “oh, sh*t” response would have broken through and kept people rational. And keep in mind that “a really strong immune system” often leads to a cytokine storm that burns out the lungs.