Except for the 5K resolution, the Studio Display is garbage.<p>It's a 5 year old LCD screen, where given price it's reasonable to expect better dimming. It's outdated in color accuracy as it scores well on DCI-P3, yet poorly on AdobeRGB (86%). For normal monitors these are good values, but they fail to impress for studio work. Further, factory calibration is shit, the white point is far too warm.<p>Where Apple brags about "billions of colors", it's not a true 10 bit screen. You just can't trust a single thing they say.<p>It's only 60hz. It's not a gaming screen but I'm just looking for any feature, any at all, to justify the price.<p>It's intentionally consumer hostile. Not only will it not really work on Windows, it also doesn't have a single button, not even a power button. It's entirely software controlled, and that should make you anxious.<p>There's no HDR support at all. Come on!? This is no longer a niche thing, it's a core need for videographers.<p>The stands, both options, do less than the cheapest stand on any other monitor.<p>All of this fits nicely into their line-up of non-pro screens. Like the bigger Pro Display XDR, according to Apple comparable to Sony's 35K$ reference monitor. Except that it isn't. Apple's display is not uniform and blooms all over the place. It's not a bad pro monitor, it's not a pro monitor at all. It literally cannot be used for color-critical work.