This map is little better than science fiction in terms of the extreme extrapolations it reaches at to get its results. I'm sorry but there's just way that no current climate modeling could come to these conclusions with anything even remotely approaching certainty.<p>If some of you would leave behind your climate change disaster porn fetishism for a bit (despite using plenty of the latest smartphone technologies in your comfortable middle to upper middle class lives while you lambast the world for "never changing"), you might consider these climate predictions rationally enough to realize that doom scenarios like these have been ongoing for decades, if not centuries and have literally no basis in fact. They are no more than speculation based on guesses derived from a snapshot of the present. Remember the air quality predictions of the 70's? How have those gone in many of the places where it was predicted that millions would suffocate? Just one example.<p>For one thing, the 2.7 degree increase they mention is desperately severe and seems to assume that nothing in our human world will improve in any way in so far as contamination of the world is concerned, or present and near future technologies to mitigate it. Secondly, the entire graphic hinges on afar too many unknown unknowns and a total lack of imagination for potential positive outcomes from warmer temperatures or human innovation under steady duress.<p>I don't deny the dangers of climate change or the effect that humans have on the world already, or if they're not careful about modulating their behavior down the road. It's also undeniable that even now, irresponsible climate actions have caused suffering for certain populations, but none of this justifies treating doom porn as a hard or realistic assessment of the future, when nothing so far has even concretely borne out older predictions of man-made climate catastrophe in even the present time.