TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

DJI is blocking operations of Ukrainian AeroScope complexes [GT from Ukrainian]

29 点作者 bberkgaut大约 3 年前

3 条评论

sbierwagen大约 3 年前
DJI civilian drones broadcast transponder data, as required by the FAA and many other nations&#x27; FAA-equivalents. DJI apparently encrypts these signals, and sells an expensive product to receive and decrypt them: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.dji.com&#x2F;aeroscope" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.dji.com&#x2F;aeroscope</a> Decoding transponder data presumably gives better accuracy than regular radio-directionfinding, which militaries have used in combat for 80 years now.<p>(UA has been operating consumer drones on the front lines, because they&#x27;re suicidal, desperate, or both. Consumer drones use narrowband transmissions on unlicensed radio bands, making them easy to jam and track. Military drones use spread-spectrum transmissions on restricted channels, making them harder to jam and detect, but are generally a hundred or a thousand times more expensive per unit.)<p>Like anything expensive sold to institutions, I assume DJI Aeroscope has some kind of yearly support contract, and the field terminal regularly phones home. It sounds like DJI has remotely terminated UA transponder receivers, and not done that with RU units, which UA is unhappy about. We also see the downsides of installing infrastructure operated by a hostile foreign power.
评论 #30913321 未加载
评论 #30915332 未加载
评论 #30913711 未加载
car_analogy大约 3 年前
Auto-translated: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www-epravda-com-ua.translate.goog&#x2F;rus&#x2F;publications&#x2F;2022&#x2F;03&#x2F;30&#x2F;684906&#x2F;?_x_tr_sl=auto&amp;_x_tr_tl=en&amp;_x_tr_hl=en-US&amp;_x_tr_pto=wapp" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www-epravda-com-ua.translate.goog&#x2F;rus&#x2F;publications&#x2F;2...</a>
natch大约 3 年前
In case it isn’t known by everyone, DJI is a Chinese company.<p>So it would appear this development is conveniently in line with the Beijing Communist Party’s policy of enabling the rape and butchering of Ukraine.<p>And possibly one of the first real world examples, if intentional (note I didn’t say it was intentional but we don’t have evidence that it’s not, and no need to point out the converse), of the dangers of using technology sourced from a brutal dictatorship.