>But Google is currently facing anti-trust scrutiny by Senate subcommittees, and the bigger it gets the less answerable the regulatory threat will become<p>Worth noting again that the article is from 2011. Did anything come of this "scrutiny" then? Will it now? How reasonable would it be to therefore charactarize "scrutiny by Senate subcommittees" as "donation requests to Google from sitting Senators"? Is asking leading questions a rhetorical flourish or intellectual dishonesty?