TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

MIT Engineers Create New Material Stronger Than Steel and Light as Plastic

110 点作者 leothekim大约 3 年前

13 条评论

cbracketdash大约 3 年前
Title should be, "MIT Engineers Create New Material Stronger Than Steel, Light as Plastic, and More Expensive than Gold"
评论 #31053620 未加载
评论 #31055892 未加载
评论 #31058084 未加载
_0w8t大约 3 年前
Comparing with abstract steel is kind of useless as the strength of common steel varies by factor of 3. If one compare the cheapest steel and exotic alloys (that are often only produced in Sweden and may cost more than silver), then the difference is at least a factor of 20.
评论 #31053920 未加载
kazinator大约 3 年前
Nylon fishing line is stronger than steel and light as plastic.
评论 #31052752 未加载
评论 #31053627 未加载
评论 #31053320 未加载
MeteorMarc大约 3 年前
There is also the micro plastics issue to solve, before widening the scope of plastic applications.
评论 #31052535 未加载
评论 #31052571 未加载
ajmurmann大约 3 年前
Was it clear to anyone in what way it's stronger than steel? The article mostly talks about applications where it's used as a coating. At the same time it says the sheets can be layered and create very strong bonds. Why can't I make the entire object out of this polymer? Is it hard to tear but not very rigid/too floppy? It sounded like it won't bust the bank either.
评论 #31057789 未加载
Karliss大约 3 年前
Can anyone explain why having polymer connected in 2d sheets is better than connecting in all 3 dimensions?
评论 #31051954 未加载
评论 #31051949 未加载
评论 #31052116 未加载
photochemsyn大约 3 年前
This looks very interesting, in particular that it can be made gas-tight:<p>&gt; &quot;Another key feature of 2DPA-1 is that it is impermeable to gases. While other polymers are made from coiled chains with gaps that allow gases to seep through, the new material is made from monomers that lock together like LEGOs, and molecules cannot get between them.&quot;<p>However, this is yet another example of how excessive corporatization of academia can block the adoption and spread of new technologies created with taxpayer funds:<p>&gt; &quot;The research was funded by the Center for Enhanced Nanofluidic Transport (CENT) an Energy Frontier Research Center sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science, and the Army Research Laboratory.&quot;<p>&gt; &quot;The researchers have filed for two patents on the process they used to generate the material...&quot;<p>So, who gets access to these patents? It should be the case that MIT be required to license these patents to any American citizen who is interested, non-exclusively, for free, as it was American taxpayers who financed this project.<p>Similarly, the actual paper is hidden behind a paywall at Nature, so independent researchers without an institutional affiliation have no access to the details without paying ridiculous fees; the paper wasn&#x27;t uploaded to arxiv and isn&#x27;t yet on sci-hub, and why not? So some publishers can extract fees for their decrepit business model?<p>Sci-hub_se does at least have copies of some of the references cited in the paper, if you search for this one you&#x27;ll get the background (2009): &quot;Two-Dimensional Polymers: Just a Dream of Synthetic Chemists?&quot;<p>&gt; &quot;The fact that one can now isolate and investigate the natural 2D polymer graphene begs the question as to whether such intriguing structures could also be synthesized. [5] This question is not limited to whether one can synthesize graphene—this would be just one target of the entire family of 2D polymers, although admittedly an especially compli- cated and challenging one. It is meant much more general in the sense: Can one provide reliable and broadly applicable concepts to tackle the synthetic and analytical issues associ- ated with the creation of polymers which meet the structural characteristics of graphene (that is, one repeating unit thick, covalently bonded, and long-range order). Clearly, this would constitute a substantial advance for chemistry in particular, and the molecular sciences in general&quot;
评论 #31053374 未加载
评论 #31053089 未加载
crate_barre大约 3 年前
I feel like I’ve been hearing about Materials of this type for years and have never seen anything practical built with it. How about they make a phone with this already?
cendyne大约 3 年前
I wonder what kind of efficiencies can be gained by swapping out metal for this in EV vehicles
评论 #31053896 未加载
riazrizvi大约 3 年前
This sounds like it should be headline news, a much bigger deal than votes imply.
vermilingua大约 3 年前
Finally, plasteel.
dccoolgai大约 3 年前
Sounds like transparent aluminum.
评论 #31053109 未加载
评论 #31052574 未加载
zeroping大约 3 年前
I can&#x27;t take this too seriously after the &quot;stock video to illustrate the concept of a super strong cell phone&quot; at the top.