TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Testing consistency of rqlite

139 点作者 otoolep大约 3 年前

6 条评论

otoolep大约 3 年前
rqlite author here, happy to answer any questions. Many thanks to Nienke Eijsvogel, Ruben van Baarle and Daan de Graaf for executing this testing.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;rqlite&#x2F;rqlite" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;rqlite&#x2F;rqlite</a>
评论 #31090457 未加载
评论 #31096285 未加载
评论 #31090729 未加载
评论 #31091845 未加载
gunapologist99大约 3 年前
Can you also auto-shard with rqlite, or is it only designed to distribute a single set of data among many SQLite instances?<p>EDIT: Looks like no: &quot;rqlite is about replicating a set of data, which has been written to it using SQL. The data is replicated for fault tolerance because your data is so important that you want multiple copies distributed in different places, you want be able to query your data even if some machines fail, or both.&quot;
评论 #31093513 未加载
评论 #31091062 未加载
wildarch大约 3 年前
One of the authors of the tests and blog post here, let me know if you have any questions about our testing process.
评论 #31095268 未加载
KingOfCoders大约 3 年前
What is the difference between Rqlite adn Dqlite?
评论 #31095262 未加载
Thaxll大约 3 年前
How people use SQLite outside single app, how do you manage RBAC?
Operyl大约 3 年前
EDIT: Title has been slightly changed, now. It was originally &quot;Jepsen testing of rqlite, the distributed DB built on Raft and SQLite&quot;<p>Hmm, perhaps a bit of confusion from the title. It sounds like they ran the Jepsen suite of tests against rqlite, which is great, but not done _by_ Jepsen &#x2F; Kyle (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;jepsen.io" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;jepsen.io</a>). Others have done this themselves too and that&#x27;s fine, but half the of the problem is correctly implementing the tests which has been done incorrectly by others in the past.
评论 #31090668 未加载
评论 #31090418 未加载
评论 #31092282 未加载