TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Meta COO Sandberg reportedly tried to block story about Activision CEO Kotick

208 点作者 ahiknsr大约 3 年前

14 条评论

gordon_freeman大约 3 年前
I don’t get it - Article says Meta is reviewing her conduct [0] but then the same article mentions the spokesperson statement essentially saying she didn’t do it. [1] So is Meta done reviewing?<p>[0] Facebook is now reviewing whether Sandberg violated company rules, unnamed sources told the Journal.<p>[1] “Sheryl Sandberg never threatened the MailOnline’s business relationship with Facebook in order to influence an editorial decision,” a Meta spokesperson said in a statement. “This story attempts to make connections that don’t exist.”
评论 #31117790 未加载
评论 #31117760 未加载
评论 #31118052 未加载
GauntletWizard大约 3 年前
This article gives so little detail it&#x27;s hard to see what&#x27;s been said. It&#x27;s reporting on a report that Sandberg involved meta employees with a coordinated PR campaign with Activision, but doesn&#x27;t actually say what they said to the mail or even hint at it. Sandberg giving a personal reference to her boyfriend of &quot;He&#x27;s never hit me&quot; would probably have been partially Facebook&#x27;s problem, given her position as COO. On the other hand, she could have used that position to make threats at the mail, the article hints but refuses to state.<p>You can probably infer all you need to about Sheryl&#x27;s personal ethics from &quot;Works at Meta&quot;, so any involvement with Kotick is mere icing.
评论 #31127530 未加载
madrox大约 3 年前
Probably nothing will come of this, as there&#x27;s a tenuous line to be drawn between squashing the story and Facebook&#x27;s interests via Sandberg getting pulled in since they were dating at the time. Her perception does affect stock price, after all.<p>That said, the really damaging thing I learned from this article was that she dated Bobby Kotick. I didn&#x27;t want to know that.
bogwog大约 3 年前
Didnt this guy also implicated some governor in something similar? How does this dude have so much influence?
评论 #31117906 未加载
jackvalentine大约 3 年前
_Lean in_ apparently means use your power to shield your wealthy boyfriend from scrutiny.
评论 #31117196 未加载
评论 #31116854 未加载
评论 #31116598 未加载
Gatsky大约 3 年前
This story is being spun the wrong way. The real issue isn’t that she tried to quash the story (I mean, who wants their dirty laundry aired in public?), it’s that the Daily Mail lacked the fortitude and integrity to ignore her.
评论 #31118983 未加载
评论 #31117341 未加载
stakkur大约 3 年前
Is it not widely known anymore what a nasty operator Sandberg is? Once upon a time she was rather infamous.
ec109685大约 3 年前
Barbra Streisand effect in full display here. She was trying to get a story of a somewhat retracted restraining order squashed.
评论 #31117752 未加载
walrus01大约 3 年前
The Daily Mail and The Star, etc, are not actual journalism. That they caved in to demands from somebody like Sandberg and Meta is not surprising in the slightest. They&#x27;re far right wing agitation&#x2F;propaganda tools that only publish things when they serve their purposes.
approxim8ion大约 3 年前
Gaslight, gatekeep, girlboss!
ilrwbwrkhv大约 3 年前
Of course she did. It&#x27;s not surprising at all.
评论 #31117448 未加载
eric4smith大约 3 年前
People try to squash stories all the time. Especially if there is something to lose.<p>It’s human nature.<p>Move on.
throw7大约 3 年前
I love Sheryl. She has something very few possess: IQ and EQ.
评论 #31116936 未加载
评论 #31117270 未加载
评论 #31116897 未加载
IAmWorried大约 3 年前
Powerful people will be powerful people. Who the hell cares?
评论 #31116873 未加载