TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Building the Inverse Jim Cramer Index

60 点作者 vampiretooth1大约 3 年前

7 条评论

ProjectArcturis大约 3 年前
So, they tried a whole bunch of things, and even with the benefit of that lookforward bias, their final strategy still underperformed the S&amp;P? Color me unimpressed.<p>Edit: I looked at their site and it&#x27;s clear that their business model is just to gather assets to charge fees on. Which is why they&#x27;ve developed strategies like Inverse Cramer, Pelosi Tracker, WallStreetBets -- these strategies don&#x27;t have any alpha, they&#x27;re just designed to catch the eye of retail traders.<p>Also this scumbaggery, from their website:<p>&quot;$70M+ Assets Committed*&quot;<p>Then way at the bottom:<p>&quot;* = &quot;Assets committed&quot; refers to captured user behavior in attempted investments and not to assets being actively managed.&quot;
评论 #31137694 未加载
评论 #31138350 未加载
评论 #31138010 未加载
calderwoodra大约 3 年前
Is there any reason to believe that Jim Cramer (or the inverse of Jim Cramer) would do particularly well in the stock market?<p>I imagine following a cat picking random stocks works about as well. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.npr.org&#x2F;sections&#x2F;money&#x2F;2013&#x2F;01&#x2F;14&#x2F;169326326&#x2F;housecat-beats-investors-in-stock-market-challenge" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.npr.org&#x2F;sections&#x2F;money&#x2F;2013&#x2F;01&#x2F;14&#x2F;169326326&#x2F;hous...</a>
评论 #31137278 未加载
评论 #31137607 未加载
评论 #31137431 未加载
评论 #31137467 未加载
pavlov大约 3 年前
For taking a position against another growth stock hype luminary, there exists an inverse Cathie Wood index you can trade: an ETF with the ticker SARK (“short ARK”). It has done quite well since its inception last year.
评论 #31137488 未加载
robonerd大约 3 年前
But what happens when Jim Cramer starts promoting the Inverse Jim Cramer Index?
评论 #31137775 未加载
评论 #31137978 未加载
chii大约 3 年前
The idea of an inverse cramer index assumes that cramer is always telling the &quot;wrong&quot; thing - that is, his predictions are inversely correlated with the truth (or outcome).<p>That&#x27;s not what cramer&#x27;s predictions are though - his predictions are likely not far off from a random flip of the coin. So an inverse is likely to perform just as well (or poorly) as the real prediction!
评论 #31225808 未加载
leobg大约 3 年前
My tongue-in-cheek heuristic for the last couple of years has actually been the Inverse Gates Index.
tjs8rj大约 3 年前
Very interesting and Quantbase looks neat (as well as the other investing strategies you link to: Pelosi Tracker, leveraged long run investing, etc).<p>Is there a case for this as an actual investment or primarily novelty?
评论 #31137194 未加载
评论 #31137722 未加载
评论 #31137146 未加载