TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Can we fix the term “Web3”? It is cringe

6 点作者 lucasgonze大约 3 年前
1. This stuff is not webby, usually. Hash trees are not the web. IPFS is not the web. NFTs are not the web. PoW is not the web.<p>2. The web2 meme was hype from the beginning. Just let it die.<p>3. Other tech (like, RDF) already tried to claim the term “web 3,” years ago. Trying to snarf it isn&#x27;t even original.<p>4. Aspiring to be “web 3” is euphoria. It&#x27;s delusional. The web is a monster success. Almost nothing in krypto compares.<p>When people talk about crypto or web3 what they usually mean is P2P. Just say it if that&#x27;s what you mean.

3 条评论

mindcrime大约 3 年前
<i>Other tech (like, RDF) already tried to claim the term “web 3,” years ago.</i><p>That was Web 3.0. Which in some ways makes this even more egregiously cringe. It&#x27;s just different enough to be different and just similar enough to be confusing, while simultaneously conveying no semantic information at all (which to be fair, neither did &quot;Web 3.0&quot;, which is kinda ironic...).
评论 #31318648 未加载
nsonha大约 3 年前
&gt; The web is a monster success<p>I mean it works, the tech is a hot mess. I don&#x27;t want to restart the whole binary vs text discussion
cyanydeez大约 3 年前
No.<p>It&#x27;s. JavaScript pAckage and aeme<p>You can&#x27;t fix memes
评论 #31322578 未加载