TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

FAA changes course on eVTOL certification

65 点作者 jeffreyrogers大约 3 年前

9 条评论

timbre1234大约 3 年前
I'm usually not anti-government, but the FAA has absolutely lost its way and is causing far more harm than good nowadays. Look at lead in avgas. The Boeing fiascos. Inability and cost of innovating in the space. America is being left behind in global aviation.
评论 #31332305 未加载
评论 #31333602 未加载
评论 #31333337 未加载
评论 #31332411 未加载
评论 #31332479 未加载
aeternum大约 3 年前
Onerous certification incentivizes companies to invent in other countries.<p>The FAA has become increasing bureaucratic and in many cases it is causing safety issues. Take the recent case where they deemed it illegal to do a low-pass over a private airstrip to assess safety prior to landing.<p>I&#x27;d like to see the FAA do a pass over existing and new regulations to see if they can generalize any of the rules. IE if the concern for safety is due to momentum&#x2F;potential energy, codify that rather than separate limitations on weight and speed.
评论 #31331929 未加载
评论 #31332313 未加载
评论 #31333044 未加载
评论 #31332625 未加载
imoverclocked大约 3 年前
I’m not sure why this classification wasn’t used originally. This shift makes sense to me but I’m also unable to read the entire article.
评论 #31331052 未加载
user_7832大约 3 年前
Could someone with an aviation background chime in on what this entails? I would think that VTOL pilot&#x2F;aircraft certification would be more stricter&#x2F;tighter than light aircrafts. I wonder if this move was made by the FAA being slightly concerned about the safety, though the AW609 mentioned in the (initial) part of the article is a light aircraft... which raises the question on why VTOL rules weren&#x27;t applied right from the start.<p>Side note: why does this website restrict copying text, or even middle-button scrolling?
评论 #31330955 未加载
评论 #31333225 未加载
评论 #31331299 未加载
adrianparsons大约 3 年前
Wow, bad timing for Eve Air Mobility, who just started trading on the NYSE this morning.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;evtol.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;eve-goes-public-nyse-zanite-shareholders-approve-merger&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;evtol.com&#x2F;news&#x2F;eve-goes-public-nyse-zanite-sharehold...</a>
评论 #31331490 未加载
keeganjw大约 3 年前
I hope the FAA and EVTOL companies can work this out and these new rules don&#x27;t significantly disrupt or destroy such a nascent industry. Of course the aircraft need to be safe but I hope there will still be a clear path for them to become fully certified.
评论 #31332653 未加载
imglorp大约 3 年前
A few more details without a paywall.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.flyingmag.com&#x2F;faa-modifying-approach-to-evtol-certification&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.flyingmag.com&#x2F;faa-modifying-approach-to-evtol-ce...</a>
marmalar大约 3 年前
Anybody noticed that you can&#x27;t highlight text on this website? When I try to double click, it pops up an &quot;! <i>ALERT:</i> Content is protected !!&quot;. Seems like a futile usefulness oversight, especially since if I really need to, I can:<p>- copy the text via eyeballs-&gt;keyboard<p>- copy the text from the dev console<p>- take a screenshot and extract the text with Google Photos or something
评论 #31332208 未加载
评论 #31332130 未加载
评论 #31332069 未加载
评论 #31331992 未加载
评论 #31331982 未加载
Justin_K大约 3 年前
I&#x27;m glad the FAA is clamping down on these... I don&#x27;t want one of these falling on my house because someone forgot to set the environment variables.
评论 #31332127 未加载
评论 #31331517 未加载