TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Two judges gave Texas control over Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube

7 点作者 IAmEveryone大约 3 年前

5 条评论

elmerfud大约 3 年前
My real problem with this whole law is that it&#x27;s a lame and run around that will be difficult to enforce. Sure it may be enforced on big personalities who have lots of followers who can then get cut off for curtailed but that does not help the average person.<p>Instead what they should have done is picked a reasonable size of active users or some other measure and instead of preventing banning of accounts or silencing the speech they should require that the company&#x27;s policies must be cited in detail for their actions.<p>For example if Facebook decides that your post should be deleted it must send you the exact portion of their terms of service that you have violated and cite the specific examples of your post that violate those terms of service. There should also be a means of redress or correction available. This way we can see exactly how these companies are censoring people and what their logic and reasoning is and we can tell if that violates pre-existing rights of people. The exact same thing should apply to a ban they must site in detail the actions that you took and the policies that you violated instead of the nebulous violated our terms of service that we don&#x27;t have to tell you why.<p>What people fail to understand is terms of service are not a blanket this company can do anything. Any terms of service that are against the law are meaningless such as provisions in a contract that violate the law those provisions hold no power. But when they enforce this they never tell you what you did or why you did it.<p>This law is just a joke typical paid politicians that are ignoring root problems.
armchairhacker大约 3 年前
Like how these sites have blocklists in China&#x2F;Russia&#x2F;other countries, what if they provide an &quot;allow-list&quot; for content in Texas? So stuff gets flagged &#x2F; banned as usual, <i>except</i> in Texas the bans don&#x27;t apply.<p>If they really want to they could require users go through many hoops to prove they&#x27;re in Texas, and then add things like latency issues, so that they &quot;technically&quot; comply with the ruling but not really. Kind of like what Apple does with their App Store (not latency but other stuff, like allowing dating apps in Sweden to use custom payment, making custom payment have all these requirements, etc.)<p>Bonus points for ensuring that the front page gets filled with spam, because that&#x27;s what you get with &quot;zero censorship&quot;. Even though artificially down-weighing content isn&#x27;t the same as censoring it. Oh, and they also secretly unlist the conservative content the bill actually aims to protect anyways.
评论 #31376180 未加载
thghtihadanacct大约 3 年前
Im really wondering about the &#x27;or else&#x27; here. There is no great firewall of texas and best they can do is seize servers located there. Supreme court i guess?
Group_B大约 3 年前
Facebook will be off that list soon
meatsauce大约 3 年前
Damn, we might have to deal with opinions we don&#x27;t like. Whatever will we do?
评论 #31374167 未加载