TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Ask HN: Next vs. Blitz vs. Remix,which fullstack JavaScript framework to select?

7 点作者 tiktaktow大约 3 年前
I have used React extensively for frontend in combination with Node&#x2F;Express and Python backends. I want to explore a fullstack JS framework for my next project but having a hard time deciding on which to bet on. The project is a webapp that also serves API endpoints for a separate mobile app. No need for best SEO and excpetional performance and speed. If all goes according to the plan, the web app may have around 500 and mobile app may have 50,000 users at max.<p>I have looked at Next, Blitz and Remix, and all of them look very promising. Next has a simple routing and options for SSR, SSG and CSR, which is a big advantage for serving different kind of contents for the users. But I&#x27;m not sure if it can match Express&#x27; performance in backend tasks. Blitz has scaffolding, simple routing and simplified data fetching. But its community and documentation is still small. Remix is exciting because of its use of web native features and nested routing. But its still new and I&#x27;m not so confident about its backend performance.<p>I am looking for advice from experienced devs who have used these frameworks for fullstack in production. Is any one of them a good bet as a fullstack solution? Or should I stick with separate React&#x2F;Next for frontend and Express for backend?

1 comment

flybayer大约 3 年前
Any of those, including RedwoodJS, will all give you plenty of performance!<p>I highly recommend you build it in a monolithic approach, because it will make it a lot easier and faster to build.<p>Since you are mobile app heavy, I would probably go with GraphQL using RedwoodJS+Prisma or Next.js+Prisma+Pathos [1]<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;pothos-graphql.dev&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;pothos-graphql.dev&#x2F;</a>
评论 #31384804 未加载