TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Big Bottle: The Baby Formula Nightmare

8 点作者 haizhung大约 3 年前

1 comment

robocat大约 3 年前
Matt says ‘According to Healthy Babies Bright Futures, baby formula made by the big guys in the U.S. is full of dangerous brain-altering heavy metals. HBBF tested thirteen different baby formulas, and every single one had “detectable levels of arsenic, cadmium, lead and&#x2F;or mercury,” which are all considered to be neurotoxic, interfering with brain development and “causing permanent IQ reductions in children.”’.<p>Rather unscientific heavy breathing about heavy metals, since some level must exist in all foods. Matt even links to a mommyhood101.com article in the above, which I guess is the secondary source for his opinion?<p>The question is: what are reasonable limits to exposure for babies? For example, what are the EU limits for baby formula?<p>Here is the original “paper”: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.healthybabyfood.org&#x2F;sites&#x2F;healthybabyfoods.org&#x2F;files&#x2F;2019-10&#x2F;BabyFoodReport_FULLREPORT_ENGLISH_R5b.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.healthybabyfood.org&#x2F;sites&#x2F;healthybabyfoods.org&#x2F;f...</a><p>Healthy Babies Bright Futures (HBBF) paid laboratories to measure amounts, but superficially their analysis looks rather poor I think. Any good links to scientific critiques of their analysis?