TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Why this might be a bad idea: APPL MSFT and Google want you to go passwordless

1 点作者 Tomasz_Papka大约 3 年前

2 条评论

rektide大约 3 年前
Editorialized title. Original title: &quot;Apple, Microsoft, and Google want you to go passwordless. Here’s what that means&quot;. Editorialized to: &quot;Why this might be a bad idea: APPL MSFT and Google want you to go passwordless&quot;.<p>Article doesn&#x27;t seem to have any negative coverage. More like:<p>&gt; <i>But thankfully, a solution to the password problem will soon let you log into your app and browser-based services without a password. Yes, you read that right; you’ll be able to kill off a chunk of your passwords for good.</i><p>I&#x27;ve kind of been neutral here. I&#x27;ve thought it stupid that these devices resist cloneability, that seems like it forces usage of other recovery flows &amp; mainly protects big corporate interests at tradeoff to usability.<p>But right now I thought of one reason why these devices are somewhat a bad idea. I&#x27;m not totally sure of the accuracy, but I seem to remember passwords &amp; combination locks are protected under the 5th ammendment right to not self-incriminate, but things like keys are not. I&#x27;m not sure there&#x27;s any legal standing that protects a user of these devices from being compelled to turn them over.
Tomasz_Papka大约 3 年前
Arguments for why this might be a bad idea.