The title has been editorialized to imply that the IRS destroyed documents because they couldn't be bothered to process them.<p>That's not true.<p>The actual article title is: IRS destroys 30 million tax documents, insists ‘no negative taxpayer consequences’<p>> "The IRS uses these documents to conduct post-processing compliance matches to identify taxpayers who do not accurately report their income."<p>So they destroyed documents that were already processed. Further, the article is unclear on whether these documents were set fire to or automatically deleted by computer systems.<p>Great? No. What I expected from the submitted title? No.