TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

PlanetScale Portals: Read-only regions

71 点作者 fideloper将近 3 年前

5 条评论

rubiquity将近 3 年前
Looks like a nice launch for apps that need lower latency for reads. A noticeable omission from the blog post is how these replicas impact consistency. Won't reads from read-only regions have a weaker consistency than you typically get with Vitess/PlanetScale? I'm guessing weaker than read-your-writes.
johtso将近 3 年前
Not directly related, I&#x27;ve been really tempted by all these exciting new database offerings.. PlanetScale, CockroachDB, FaunaDB.. but there don&#x27;t seem to be any solid (node.js) background job queue libraries that support them. I really want to take advantage of these low dev-ops high availability offerings, but I don&#x27;t want to have to tack Redis onto my stack just so I can use BullMQ, with data persistence and robustness as a bit of an afterthought.<p>And I don&#x27;t want to roll my own because it&#x27;s not a trivial thing to solve, especially with stall detection etc.<p>I&#x27;d love to just have one robust data-store.<p>Am I missing something?
评论 #31510355 未加载
评论 #31500630 未加载
评论 #31497059 未加载
评论 #31497304 未加载
epberry将近 3 年前
The automatic routing via Rails is very cool. I may try to work that up in Django as well.
stalluri将近 3 年前
This would be such a nice addition to apps deployed on fly.io
评论 #31494598 未加载
评论 #31495075 未加载
评论 #31494605 未加载
评论 #31495147 未加载
kdkeyser将近 3 年前
What kind of consistency guarantees does this offer?