Neat article. It doesn't even begin to scratch the surface. It claims that $208 million is the largest contribution.<p>Actually, Mark Zuckerberg did $400+ million, but he pretended it was a fair and balanced get out the vote.<p>If states do as they should and ban private funding before the next election, there is no way this guy puts $100-1000 million into the next election.<p>This entire article is about billionaires salivating to take over, run, and own public elections to ensure their candidate wins.<p>The response, "voter suppression", by Republicans should be in the form of allowing no private money, no ballot access, and no voter rolls WITH voters vote status.<p>Of course this is all to easily seeable, the game is out in the open.<p>They even write articles on how billionaires are going to imitate Mark Zuckerberg without mentioning Mark Zuckerberg or what he did.