A lot of this is too much for me, is too grumpy, disregards the value of online space & connectivity too much, favors the past.<p>But Im sympathetic too.<p>One thing that stood out, that- by seeing tagging & aggregators, de.icio.us and digg- I thought wecd be much better at by now is layering context & critiques, building trust & peership & review as layers atop the web page medium. Tagging, organizing, categorizing, issue-based-information-systems (IBIS), and other techniques were, I though, by now going to be voluntary overlays to help us organize & orient, to discern. There have been neat projects- e.g. Newstrition[1] browser extension- but generally progress has been minimal. Im surprised after all this time how right Stroll still is:<p>> <i>Lacking editors, reviewers, or critics, the Internet has become a wasteland of unfiltered data. You don’t know what to ignore and what’s worth reading.</i><p>[1] <a href="https://our.news/" rel="nofollow">https://our.news/</a>